Looking for an honest Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED vs TCL S Class 58S517 58" 4K UHD LED Smart TV comparison in 2026? We scored both televisions on the same six-dimension framework — performance, battery, display, camera, design and value — using identical methodology, so the numbers below are directly comparable. In our overall scoring the Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED comes out ahead 86/100 to 50/100 — a 36-point gap. The widest gap is in battery life, where the Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED pulls noticeably ahead. On price the Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED undercuts the TCL S Class 58S517 58" 4K UHD LED Smart TV by 20% ($250 vs $300), which materially changes the value calculus for budget-conscious buyers.
Prices may vary · We may earn a commission on purchases. Learn more
Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED clearly outperforms the TCL S Class 58S517 58" 4K UHD LED Smart TV in the televisions category, especially in battery life, scoring 86 vs 50. If you want the better overall televisions, Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED is the recommended choice.
Picking Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED over TCL S Class 58S517 58" 4K UHD LED Smart TV means trading these off.
Samsung
$250
Scores are relative within the televisionscategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.
✓ Pros
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
| Spec | Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLEDW | TCL S Class 58S517 58" 4K UHD LED Smart TV |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 85"✓ | 58" |
| Panel Type | Neo QLED | LED |
| Resolution | 3840 x 2160 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz✓ | 60Hz |
| HDR | HDR10+ | Dolby Vision, HDR10+ |
| Weight | 4500g | 2200g✓ |
| Price | 250$✓ | 300$ |
Buy Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED if…
Buy the Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Buy TCL S Class 58S517 58" 4K UHD LED Smart TV if…
The TCL S Class 58S517 58" 4K UHD LED Smart TV is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED clearly outperforms the TCL S Class 58S517 58" 4K UHD LED Smart TV in the televisions category, especially in battery life, scoring 86 vs 50. If you want the better overall televisions, Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED is the recommended choice.
Yes, Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED scores higher overall (86 vs 50).
Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED is cheaper at $250 vs $300 for the TCL S Class 58S517 58" 4K UHD LED Smart TV.
Buy the Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
The TCL S Class 58S517 58" 4K UHD LED Smart TV is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED has the larger display (85" vs 58").
TCL S Class 58S517 58" 4K UHD LED Smart TV is lighter at 2200g vs 4500g.
Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED has more RAM (4GB vs 2GB), which helps with multitasking.
Reviewed by VersusMatrix Editorial Team
Last updated: May 11, 2026
Methodology: AI-powered analysis of technical specifications from manufacturer data. Scores are calculated by comparing products across multiple dimensions and normalized relative to the full category database. Our editorial process is independent and not influenced by affiliate partnerships.
