Looking for an honest Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED vs TCL 65S451 comparison in 2026? We scored both televisions on the same six-dimension framework — performance, battery, display, camera, design and value — using identical methodology, so the numbers below are directly comparable. In our overall scoring the Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED comes out ahead 86/100 to 53/100 — a 33-point gap. The widest gap is in battery life, where the Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED pulls noticeably ahead. On price the Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED undercuts the TCL 65S451 by 13% ($250 vs $282), which materially changes the value calculus for budget-conscious buyers.
Prices may vary · We may earn a commission on purchases. Learn more
Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED clearly outperforms the TCL 65S451 in the televisions category, especially in battery life, scoring 86 vs 53. If you want the better overall televisions, Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED is the recommended choice.
Picking Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED over TCL 65S451 means trading these off.
Nothing meaningful — specs are roughly matched
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
| Spec | Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLEDW | TCL 65S451 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 85"✓ | 65" |
| Panel Type | Neo QLED | LED |
| Resolution | 3840 x 2160 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz✓ | 60Hz |
| Brightness | — | 300nits |
| HDR |
Buy Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED if…
Buy the Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Buy TCL 65S451 if…
The TCL 65S451 is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED clearly outperforms the TCL 65S451 in the televisions category, especially in battery life, scoring 86 vs 53. If you want the better overall televisions, Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED is the recommended choice.
Yes, Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED scores higher overall (86 vs 53).
Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED is cheaper at $250 vs $282 for the TCL 65S451.
Buy the Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
The TCL 65S451 is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED has the larger display (85" vs 65").
Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED is lighter at 4500g vs 15000g.
Reviewed by VersusMatrix Editorial Team
Last updated: May 11, 2026
Methodology: AI-powered analysis of technical specifications from manufacturer data. Scores are calculated by comparing products across multiple dimensions and normalized relative to the full category database. Our editorial process is independent and not influenced by affiliate partnerships.
Scores are relative within the televisionscategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.
| HDR10+ |
| HDR10 |
| Speakers | — | Yes, 3.5mm jack |
| Weight | 4500g✓ | 15000g |
| Price | 250$✓ | 282$ |
Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED has more RAM (4GB vs 2GB), which helps with multitasking.

