Looking for an honest Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED vs TCL Q5-series 4K Uhd Hdr Pro Qled comparison in 2026? We scored both televisions on the same six-dimension framework — performance, battery, display, camera, design and value — using identical methodology, so the numbers below are directly comparable. In our overall scoring the Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED comes out ahead 86/100 to 61/100 — a 25-point gap. The widest gap is in battery life, where the Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED pulls noticeably ahead. On price the TCL Q5-series 4K Uhd Hdr Pro Qled undercuts the Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED by 39% ($179.99 vs $250), which materially changes the value calculus for budget-conscious buyers.
Prices may vary · We may earn a commission on purchases. Learn more
Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED clearly outperforms the TCL Q5-series 4K Uhd Hdr Pro Qled in the televisions category, especially in battery life, scoring 86 vs 61. If you want the better overall televisions, Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED is the recommended choice.
Picking Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED over TCL Q5-series 4K Uhd Hdr Pro Qled means trading these off.
Samsung
$250
Scores are relative within the televisionscategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
| Spec | Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLEDW | TCL Q5-series 4K Uhd Hdr Pro Qled |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 85"✓ | 50" |
| Panel Type | Neo QLED | QLED |
| Resolution | 3840 x 2160 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz✓ | 60Hz |
| HDR | HDR10+ | HDR10+ |
| Weight | 4500g✓ | 12000g |
| Price | 250$ | 179.99$✓ |
Buy Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED if…
Buy the Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED if you want the best overall value in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Buy TCL Q5-series 4K Uhd Hdr Pro Qled if…
The TCL Q5-series 4K Uhd Hdr Pro Qled is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED clearly outperforms the TCL Q5-series 4K Uhd Hdr Pro Qled in the televisions category, especially in battery life, scoring 86 vs 61. If you want the better overall televisions, Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED is the recommended choice.
Yes, Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED scores higher overall (86 vs 61).
TCL Q5-series 4K Uhd Hdr Pro Qled is cheaper at $179.99 vs $250 for the Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED.
Buy the Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED if you want the best overall value in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
The TCL Q5-series 4K Uhd Hdr Pro Qled is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED has the larger display (85" vs 50").
Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED is lighter at 4500g vs 12000g.
Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED has more RAM (4GB vs 2GB), which helps with multitasking.
Reviewed by VersusMatrix Editorial Team
Last updated: May 11, 2026
Methodology: AI-powered analysis of technical specifications from manufacturer data. Scores are calculated by comparing products across multiple dimensions and normalized relative to the full category database. Our editorial process is independent and not influenced by affiliate partnerships.
