Looking for an honest Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (2025) vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra comparison in 2026? We scored both smartphones on the same six-dimension framework — performance, battery, display, camera, design and value — using identical methodology, so the numbers below are directly comparable. In our overall scoring the Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (2025) comes out ahead 58/100 to 52/100 — a 6-point gap. The widest gap is in performance, where the Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (2025) pulls noticeably ahead. On price the Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (2025) undercuts the Xiaomi 15 Ultra by 450% ($199.99 vs $1,099), which materially changes the value calculus for budget-conscious buyers.

Prices may vary · We may earn a commission on purchases. Learn more
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (2025) narrowly beats the Xiaomi 15 Ultra in the smartphones category, especially in value ($199.99 vs $1099), scoring 58 vs 52. If you want the better overall smartphones, Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (2025) is the recommended choice.
Picking Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (2025) over Xiaomi 15 Ultra means trading these off.
Samsung
$200
Scores are relative within the smartphonescategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (2025)W | Xiaomi 15 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 6.7" | 6.73"✓ |
| Display Type | Super AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz |
| Brightness | — | 3200nits |
| HDR | — | HDR10+, Dolby Vision |
| Protection | — | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Chipset | Exynos 1380 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| CPU | Octa-core 2.4 GHz | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 | Adreno 830 |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB |
| Storage | 512GB | 512GB |
| Storage Options | 128GB, 256GB | 512GB |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.63 |
| OIS | — | Yes |
| Zoom | — | 4.3x optical, 10x optical periscope |
| Video | 4K@30fps | 8K@30fps, 4K@120fps |
| Front Camera | 32MP | 32MP |
| Battery | 5000mAh | 6000mAh✓ |
| Charging | 25W | 90W✓ |
| Wireless Charging | — | 80W |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 15, HyperOS 2 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| NFC | — | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 |
| Water Resistance | — | IP68 |
| Biometrics | — | Under-display fingerprint, Face unlock |
| Dimensions | 158.5 x 74.8 x 8.4 mm | 161.4 x 75.3 x 9.5 mm |
| Weight | 210g✓ | 229g |
| Colors | Black, White, Blue, Pink | Black, White |
| Price | 199.99$ | 1099$ |
Buy Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (2025) if…
Buy the Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (2025) if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Buy Xiaomi 15 Ultra if…
The Xiaomi 15 Ultra is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (2025) narrowly beats the Xiaomi 15 Ultra in the smartphones category, especially in value ($199.99 vs $1099), scoring 58 vs 52. If you want the better overall smartphones, Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (2025) is the recommended choice.
Yes, Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (2025) scores higher overall (83 vs 77).
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (2025) is cheaper at $199.99 vs $1099 for the Xiaomi 15 Ultra.
Buy the Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (2025) if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
The Xiaomi 15 Ultra is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Xiaomi 15 Ultra has a larger battery (6,000mAh vs 5,000mAh for the Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (2025)), which generally means longer use between charges.
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (2025) is lighter at 210g vs 229g.
Reviewed by VersusMatrix Editorial Team
Last updated: June 1, 2026
Methodology: AI-powered analysis of technical specifications from manufacturer data. Scores are calculated by comparing products across multiple dimensions and normalized relative to the full category database. Our editorial process is independent and not influenced by affiliate partnerships.