Olympus Om-d E-m1 vs Ricoh GR IIIx
Looking for an honest Olympus Om-d E-m1 vs Ricoh GR IIIx comparison in 2026? We scored both cameras on the same six-dimension framework — performance, battery, display, camera, design and value — using identical methodology, so the numbers below are directly comparable. In our overall scoring the Ricoh GR IIIx comes out ahead 32/100 to 44/100 — a 12-point gap. The widest gap is in battery life, where the Ricoh GR IIIx pulls noticeably ahead. On price the Olympus Om-d E-m1 undercuts the Ricoh GR IIIx by 280% ($263 vs $999), which materially changes the value calculus for budget-conscious buyers.
Olympus
OM-D E-M1
Prices may vary · We may earn a commission on purchases. Learn more
AI Matrix
Powered by Claude AIRicoh GR IIIx edges out the Olympus Om-d E-m1 in the cameras category, especially in battery life, scoring 44 vs 32. If you want the better overall cameras, Ricoh GR IIIx is the recommended choice.
5 Reasons Why Ricoh GR IIIx Is Better
- 1.Lighter: 250g vs 497g
- 2.Better performance score: 35 vs 6
- 3.Better battery score: 35 vs 0
- 4.Higher design rating: 95 vs 86
- 5.Higher overall score: 44 vs 32
What are you giving up?
Picking Ricoh GR IIIx over Olympus Om-d E-m1 means trading these off.
You give up
- −$736 cheaper ($263 vs $999)
You gain
- +247g lighter (250g vs 497g)
