Marshall Emberton III vs Ultimate Ears Hyperboom
Prices may vary · We may earn a commission on purchases. Learn more
AI Matrix
Powered by Claude AIMarshall Emberton III clearly outperforms the Ultimate Ears Hyperboom in the bluetooth speakers category, especially in design, scoring 61 vs 43. If you want the better overall bluetooth speakers, Marshall Emberton III is the recommended choice.
5 Reasons Why Marshall Emberton III Is Better
- 1.Lighter: 700g vs 4000g
- 2.Lower price: $149 vs $399
- 3.Better display rating: 88 vs 50
- 4.Higher design rating: 90 vs 21
- 5.Better value score: 74 vs 21
What are you giving up?
Picking Marshall Emberton III over Ultimate Ears Hyperboom means trading these off.
You give up
- −Longer battery life: 24h vs 20h
You gain
- +$250 cheaper ($149 vs $399)
- +3300g lighter (700g vs 4000g)
Spec Comparison
Marshall Emberton IIIUltimate Ears Hyperboom
Score Breakdown
Marshall Emberton IIIUltimate Ears Hyperboom
35
Sound35% weight
35Tie
62
Battery Life25% weight
77Ultimate Ears Hyperboom Winner
74
Price15% weight
21Marshall Emberton III Winner
90
Portability15% weight
21Marshall Emberton III Winner
88
Water Resist10% weight
50Marshall Emberton III Winner
Scores are relative within the bluetooth speakerscategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.
Marshall Emberton III
Winner✓ Pros
- ●Lower price: $149 vs $399
- ●Lighter build: 700g vs 4000g
- ●Better display score
✗ Cons
- ●Shorter battery life: 20h vs 24h
- ●Weaker battery score
Ultimate Ears Hyperboom
✓ Pros
- ●Longer battery life: 24h vs 20h
- ●Better battery score
✗ Cons
- ●Higher price: $399 vs $149
- ●Higher price relative to value
- ●Lower display score
Spec Comparison
| Spec | Marshall Emberton IIIW | Ultimate Ears Hyperboom |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 149$✓ | 399$ |
| Battery Life | 20hrs | 24hrs✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.0 |
| Weight | 700g✓ | 4000g |
| Dimensions | 160 x 68 x 60 mm | 360 x 180 x 180 mm |
| Colors | Black, Green | Black, White |
Who Should Buy
Buy Marshall Emberton III if…
Buy the Marshall Emberton III if you want the best overall value in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Buy Ultimate Ears Hyperboom if…
The Ultimate Ears Hyperboom is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Marshall Emberton III vs Ultimate Ears Hyperboom — FAQ
Marshall Emberton III vs Ultimate Ears Hyperboom: which is better?
Marshall Emberton III clearly outperforms the Ultimate Ears Hyperboom in the bluetooth speakers category, especially in design, scoring 61 vs 43. If you want the better overall bluetooth speakers, Marshall Emberton III is the recommended choice.
Is Marshall Emberton III better than Ultimate Ears Hyperboom?
Yes, Marshall Emberton III scores higher overall (68 vs 60).
Which is cheaper, Marshall Emberton III or Ultimate Ears Hyperboom?
Marshall Emberton III is cheaper at $149 vs $399 for the Ultimate Ears Hyperboom.
Who should buy the Marshall Emberton III?
Buy the Marshall Emberton III if you want the best overall value in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Who should buy the Ultimate Ears Hyperboom?
The Ultimate Ears Hyperboom is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Which lasts longer, Marshall Emberton III or Ultimate Ears Hyperboom?
Ultimate Ears Hyperboom lasts longer with 24 hours vs 20 hours for the other.
Which is lighter, Marshall Emberton III or Ultimate Ears Hyperboom?
Marshall Emberton III is lighter at 700g vs 4000g.
Related Comparisons
Full Marshall Emberton III review →Full Ultimate Ears Hyperboom review →All Marshall Bluetooth Speakers →All Ultimate Ears Bluetooth Speakers →
Reviewed by VersusMatrix Editorial Team
Last updated: April 25, 2026
Methodology: AI-powered analysis of technical specifications from manufacturer data. Scores are calculated by comparing products across multiple dimensions and normalized relative to the full category database. Our editorial process is independent and not influenced by affiliate partnerships.