Looking for an honest Meta Llama 3.1 405B vs Alibaba Qwen3-235B comparison in 2026? We scored both ai language models on the same six-dimension framework — performance, battery, display, camera, design and value — using identical methodology, so the numbers below are directly comparable. In our overall scoring the Alibaba Qwen3-235B comes out ahead 62/100 to 70/100 — a 8-point gap. The widest gap is in design and build, where the Alibaba Qwen3-235B pulls noticeably ahead.
Prices may vary · We may earn a commission on purchases. Learn more
Alibaba Qwen3-235B narrowly beats the Meta Llama 3.1 405B in the ai language models category, especially in design, scoring 70 vs 62. If you want the better overall ai language models, Alibaba Qwen3-235B is the recommended choice.
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
Lower cost = better value. Free = open-source self-hosted.
| Metric | 3.1 405B | Alibaba Qwen3-235B |
|---|---|---|
| Input (Prompt) | Free/1M | Free/1M |
| Output (Completion) | Free/1M | Free/1M |
| Open Source | ✓ Free | ✓ Free |
Context Window (tokens)
| Metric | 3.1 405B | Alibaba Qwen3-235B |
|---|---|---|
| Max Output | 4,096 tok | ✓8,192 tok |
| Speed | 30 tok/s | ✓60 tok/s |
| Time to First Token | 1.5s | ✓800ms |
| Languages | 8+ | ✓119+ |
Higher is better. Industry-standard AI evaluation benchmarks.
3.1 405B
Alibaba Qwen3-235B
3.1 405B
Alibaba Qwen3-235B
3.1 405B
Alibaba Qwen3-235B
3.1 405B
Alibaba Qwen3-235B
3.1 405B
Alibaba Qwen3-235B
| Feature | 3.1 405B | Alibaba Qwen3-235B |
|---|---|---|
| Reasoning / Chain-of-Thought | ✕ | ✓ |
| Vision (Image Input) | ✕ | ✕ |
| Audio Input | ✕ | ✕ |
| Video Input | ✕ | ✕ |
| Image/Audio Output | ✕ | ✕ |
| Function Calling / Tools | ✓ | ✓ |
| JSON Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Real-time Web Access | ✕ | ✕ |
| Fine-tuning Support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Batch API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Streaming | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open Source | ✓ | ✓ |
| Field | 3.1 405B | Alibaba Qwen3-235B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba |
| Parameters | 405B | 235B (22B active) |
| Knowledge Cutoff | 2023-12 | 2025-02 |
| License | Llama 3.1 Community | Qwen |
| Best For | open sourceself hostingfine tuningenterprise privacy | open sourcereasoningmultilingualChinese languagemath |
Buy Meta Llama 3.1 405B if…
The Meta Llama 3.1 405B is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Buy Alibaba Qwen3-235B if…
Buy the Alibaba Qwen3-235B if you want the best overall value in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Alibaba Qwen3-235B narrowly beats the Meta Llama 3.1 405B in the ai language models category, especially in design, scoring 70 vs 62. If you want the better overall ai language models, Alibaba Qwen3-235B is the recommended choice.
No, Alibaba Qwen3-235B scores higher (75 vs 75).
Check the latest prices using the buy links above.
The Meta Llama 3.1 405B is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Buy the Alibaba Qwen3-235B if you want the best overall value in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Reviewed by VersusMatrix Editorial Team
Last updated: April 25, 2026
Methodology: AI-powered analysis of technical specifications from manufacturer data. Scores are calculated by comparing products across multiple dimensions and normalized relative to the full category database. Our editorial process is independent and not influenced by affiliate partnerships.
Scores are relative within the ai language modelscategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.