Looking for an honest Anthropic Claude Opus 4 vs Meta Llama 3.1 405B comparison in 2026? We scored both ai language models on the same six-dimension framework — performance, battery, display, camera, design and value — using identical methodology, so the numbers below are directly comparable. In our overall scoring the Anthropic Claude Opus 4 comes out ahead 68/100 to 62/100 — a 6-point gap. The widest gap is in design and build, where the Anthropic Claude Opus 4 pulls noticeably ahead.
Prices may vary · We may earn a commission on purchases. Learn more
Anthropic Claude Opus 4 narrowly beats the Meta Llama 3.1 405B in the ai language models category, especially in design, scoring 68 vs 62. If you want the better overall ai language models, Anthropic Claude Opus 4 is the recommended choice.
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
Lower cost = better value. Free = open-source self-hosted.
| Metric | Opus 4 | 3.1 405B |
|---|---|---|
| Input (Prompt) | $15.00/1M | ✓Free/1M |
| Output (Completion) | $75.00/1M | ✓Free/1M |
| Open Source | Proprietary | ✓ Free |
Context Window (tokens)
| Metric | Opus 4 | 3.1 405B |
|---|---|---|
| Max Output | ✓32,000 tok | 4,096 tok |
| Speed | ✓60 tok/s | 30 tok/s |
| Time to First Token | ✓900ms | 1.5s |
| Languages | ✓50+ | 8+ |
Higher is better. Industry-standard AI evaluation benchmarks.
Opus 4
3.1 405B
Opus 4
3.1 405B
Opus 4
3.1 405B
Opus 4
3.1 405B
Opus 4
3.1 405B
| Feature | Opus 4 | 3.1 405B |
|---|---|---|
| Reasoning / Chain-of-Thought | ✓ | ✕ |
| Vision (Image Input) | ✓ | ✕ |
| Audio Input | ✕ | ✕ |
| Video Input | ✕ | ✕ |
| Image/Audio Output | ✕ | ✕ |
| Function Calling / Tools | ✓ | ✓ |
| JSON Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Real-time Web Access | ✕ | ✕ |
| Fine-tuning Support | ✕ | ✓ |
| Batch API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Streaming | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open Source | ✕ | ✓ |
| Field | Opus 4 | 3.1 405B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Meta |
| Parameters | — | 405B |
| Knowledge Cutoff | 2025-04 | 2023-12 |
| License | Commercial | Llama 3.1 Community |
| Best For | complex reasoningresearchadvanced codinglong form | open sourceself hostingfine tuningenterprise privacy |
Buy Anthropic Claude Opus 4 if…
Buy the Anthropic Claude Opus 4 if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Buy Meta Llama 3.1 405B if…
Choose the Meta Llama 3.1 405B if budget is your top priority — it offers competitive specs at a lower price point.
Anthropic Claude Opus 4 narrowly beats the Meta Llama 3.1 405B in the ai language models category, especially in design, scoring 68 vs 62. If you want the better overall ai language models, Anthropic Claude Opus 4 is the recommended choice.
Yes, Anthropic Claude Opus 4 scores higher overall (75 vs 75).
Check the latest prices using the buy links above.
Buy the Anthropic Claude Opus 4 if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Choose the Meta Llama 3.1 405B if budget is your top priority — it offers competitive specs at a lower price point.
Reviewed by VersusMatrix Editorial Team
Last updated: April 28, 2026
Methodology: AI-powered analysis of technical specifications from manufacturer data. Scores are calculated by comparing products across multiple dimensions and normalized relative to the full category database. Our editorial process is independent and not influenced by affiliate partnerships.
Scores are relative within the ai language modelscategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.