Prices may vary · We may earn a commission on purchases. Learn more
Skullcandy Kilo XT narrowly beats the Bose Revolve+ II in the bluetooth speakers category, especially in value ($29.99 vs $329), scoring 53 vs 48. If you want the better overall bluetooth speakers, Skullcandy Kilo XT is the recommended choice.
Picking Skullcandy Kilo XT over Bose Revolve+ II means trading these off.
Scores are relative within the bluetooth speakerscategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
| Spec | Bose Revolve+ II | Skullcandy Kilo XTW |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 329$ | 29.99$✓ |
| Battery | — | 1000mAh |
| Battery Life | 17hrs✓ | 12hrs |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| Water Resistance | — | IP67 |
| Weight | 900g | 300g✓ |
| Dimensions | 180 x 100 x 100 mm | 200x87x87 mm |
| Colors | Black, Silver | Orange, Black |
Buy Bose Revolve+ II if…
The Bose Revolve+ II is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Buy Skullcandy Kilo XT if…
Buy the Skullcandy Kilo XT if you want the best overall value in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Skullcandy Kilo XT narrowly beats the Bose Revolve+ II in the bluetooth speakers category, especially in value ($29.99 vs $329), scoring 53 vs 48. If you want the better overall bluetooth speakers, Skullcandy Kilo XT is the recommended choice.
No, Skullcandy Kilo XT scores higher (58 vs 60).
Skullcandy Kilo XT is cheaper at $29.99 vs $329 for the Bose Revolve+ II.
The Bose Revolve+ II is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Buy the Skullcandy Kilo XT if you want the best overall value in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Bose Revolve+ II lasts longer with 17 hours vs 12 hours for the other.
Skullcandy Kilo XT is lighter at 300g vs 900g.
Reviewed by VersusMatrix Editorial Team
Last updated: April 25, 2026
Methodology: AI-powered analysis of technical specifications from manufacturer data. Scores are calculated by comparing products across multiple dimensions and normalized relative to the full category database. Our editorial process is independent and not influenced by affiliate partnerships.
Who do you think wins this matchup?