Prices may vary · We may earn a commission on purchases. Learn more
Marshall Emberton III edges out the Bose Revolve+ II in the bluetooth speakers category, especially in display quality, scoring 61 vs 48. If you want the better overall bluetooth speakers, Marshall Emberton III is the recommended choice.
Picking Marshall Emberton III over Bose Revolve+ II means trading these off.
Nothing meaningful — Marshall Emberton III matches or beats Bose Revolve+ II on every measured spec.
Scores are relative within the bluetooth speakerscategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.
✗ Cons
✓ Pros
| Spec | Bose Revolve+ II | Marshall Emberton IIIW |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 329$ | 149$✓ |
| Battery Life | 17hrs | 20hrs✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Weight | 900g | 700g✓ |
| Dimensions | 180 x 100 x 100 mm | 160 x 68 x 60 mm |
| Colors | Black, Silver | Black, Green |
Buy Bose Revolve+ II if…
The Bose Revolve+ II is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Buy Marshall Emberton III if…
Buy the Marshall Emberton III if you want the best overall value in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Marshall Emberton III edges out the Bose Revolve+ II in the bluetooth speakers category, especially in display quality, scoring 61 vs 48. If you want the better overall bluetooth speakers, Marshall Emberton III is the recommended choice.
No, Marshall Emberton III scores higher (68 vs 60).
Marshall Emberton III is cheaper at $149 vs $329 for the Bose Revolve+ II.
The Bose Revolve+ II is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Buy the Marshall Emberton III if you want the best overall value in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Marshall Emberton III lasts longer with 20 hours vs 17 hours for the other.
Marshall Emberton III is lighter at 700g vs 900g.
Reviewed by VersusMatrix Editorial Team
Last updated: April 25, 2026
Methodology: AI-powered analysis of technical specifications from manufacturer data. Scores are calculated by comparing products across multiple dimensions and normalized relative to the full category database. Our editorial process is independent and not influenced by affiliate partnerships.