Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 vs Skullcandy ANC 2
Prices may vary · We may earn a commission on purchases. Learn more
AI Matrix
Powered by Claude AISkullcandy ANC 2 narrowly beats the Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 in the headphones category, especially in design, scoring 70 vs 65. If you want the better overall headphones, Skullcandy ANC 2 is the recommended choice.
5 Reasons Why Skullcandy ANC 2 Is Better
- 1.Lighter: 280g vs 310g
- 2.Lower price: $149 vs $199
- 3.Higher design rating: 100 vs 35
- 4.Better value score: 78 vs 70
- 5.Higher overall score: 70 vs 65
What are you giving up?
Picking Skullcandy ANC 2 over Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 means trading these off.
You give up
- −Longer battery life: 50h vs 30h
You gain
- +$50 cheaper ($149 vs $199)
- +30g lighter (280g vs 310g)
Spec Comparison
Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2Skullcandy ANC 2
Score Breakdown
Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2Skullcandy ANC 2
100
Codec Quality25% weight
100Tie
70
Price20% weight
78Skullcandy ANC 2 Winner
49
Battery Life20% weight
29Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 Winner
35
Noise Cancellation15% weight
100Skullcandy ANC 2 Winner
56
Driver Size10% weight
37Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 Winner
50
Water Resistance10% weight
50Tie
Scores are relative within the headphonescategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.
Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2
✓ Pros
- ●Longer battery life: 50h vs 30h
- ●Better display score
- ●Better battery score
✗ Cons
- ●Higher price: $199 vs $149
- ●Higher price relative to value
Skullcandy ANC 2
Winner✓ Pros
- ●Lower price: $149 vs $199
- ●Lighter build: 280g vs 310g
- ●Better design score
✗ Cons
- ●Shorter battery life: 30h vs 50h
- ●Weaker battery score
- ●Lower display score
Spec Comparison
| Spec | Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 | Skullcandy ANC 2W |
|---|---|---|
| Driver Size | 45mm✓ | 40mm |
| ANC | false | true |
| Transparency Mode | false | true |
| Voice Assistant | Google, Alexa | Google, Alexa |
| Battery Life | 50hrs✓ | 30hrs |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Codecs | AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Multipoint | true | true |
| Foldable | true | true |
| Weight | 310g | 280g✓ |
| Colors | Black | Black, Blue |
| Price | 199$ | 149$✓ |
Who Should Buy
Buy Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 if…
The Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Buy Skullcandy ANC 2 if…
Buy the Skullcandy ANC 2 if you want the best overall value in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 vs Skullcandy ANC 2 — FAQ
Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 vs Skullcandy ANC 2: which is better?
Skullcandy ANC 2 narrowly beats the Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 in the headphones category, especially in design, scoring 70 vs 65. If you want the better overall headphones, Skullcandy ANC 2 is the recommended choice.
Is Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 better than Skullcandy ANC 2?
No, Skullcandy ANC 2 scores higher (79 vs 62).
Which is cheaper, Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 or Skullcandy ANC 2?
Skullcandy ANC 2 is cheaper at $149 vs $199 for the Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2.
Who should buy the Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2?
The Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Who should buy the Skullcandy ANC 2?
Buy the Skullcandy ANC 2 if you want the best overall value in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Which lasts longer, Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 or Skullcandy ANC 2?
Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 lasts longer with 50 hours vs 30 hours for the other.
Which is lighter, Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 or Skullcandy ANC 2?
Skullcandy ANC 2 is lighter at 280g vs 310g.
Related Comparisons
Full Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 review →Full Skullcandy ANC 2 review →All Audio-Technica Headphones →All Skullcandy Headphones →
Reviewed by VersusMatrix Editorial Team
Last updated: April 25, 2026
Methodology: AI-powered analysis of technical specifications from manufacturer data. Scores are calculated by comparing products across multiple dimensions and normalized relative to the full category database. Our editorial process is independent and not influenced by affiliate partnerships.