Looking for an honest Apple MacBook Pro vs HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14" 2-in-1 comparison in 2026? We scored both laptops on the same six-dimension framework — performance, battery, display, camera, design and value — using identical methodology, so the numbers below are directly comparable. In our overall scoring the HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14" 2-in-1 comes out ahead 39/100 to 49/100 — a 10-point gap. The widest gap is in performance, where the HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14" 2-in-1 pulls noticeably ahead. On price the Apple MacBook Pro undercuts the HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14" 2-in-1 by 94% ($349.99 vs $680), which materially changes the value calculus for budget-conscious buyers.
Apple
Prices may vary · We may earn a commission on purchases. Learn more
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14" 2-in-1 edges out the Apple MacBook Pro in the laptops category, especially in performance, scoring 49 vs 39. If you want the better overall laptops, HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14" 2-in-1 is the recommended choice.
Picking HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14" 2-in-1 over Apple MacBook Pro means trading these off.
$350
Scores are relative within the laptopscategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
| Spec | Apple MacBook Pro | HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14" 2-in-1W |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Apple M2 Pro | AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
| GPU | Apple M2 Pro GPU | AMD Radeon 890M |
| Display | 15.4"✓ | 14" |
| Display Type | Retina | OLED |
| Resolution | 2880 x 1800 pixels | 2880 x 1800 pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz |
| Touch Screen | — | Yes (multi-touch) |
| RAM | 16GB | 32GB✓ |
| RAM Type | DDR4 | LPDDR5X |
| Storage | 512GB | 1024GB✓ |
| Storage Type | PCIe NVMe SSD | PCIe NVMe SSD |
| Battery | 58.2Wh | 64Wh✓ |
| Battery Life | 10hrs | 12hrs✓ |
| Charging | 87W✓ | 65W |
| Ports | 4x Thunderbolt 3, 1x USB-A, HDMI 2.0, SD card | 2x USB-C (Thunderbolt 4), 2x USB-A 3.2, HDMI 2.1, 3.5mm |
| USB-C | 4✓ | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.0 | HDMI 2.1 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| Webcam | 720p FaceTime HD | 1080p |
| Keyboard | Backlit Magic Keyboard | Backlit keyboard |
| Fingerprint | true | Yes |
| OS | macOS | Windows 11 Home |
| Dimensions | 349.3 x 240.7 x 15.5 mm | 313x220x16 mm |
| Weight | 1800g | 1470g✓ |
| Colors | Silver | Meteor Silver |
| Price | 349.99$✓ | 680$ |
Buy Apple MacBook Pro if…
Choose the Apple MacBook Pro if budget is your top priority — it offers competitive specs at a lower price point.
Buy HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14" 2-in-1 if…
Buy the HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14" 2-in-1 if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14" 2-in-1 edges out the Apple MacBook Pro in the laptops category, especially in performance, scoring 49 vs 39. If you want the better overall laptops, HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14" 2-in-1 is the recommended choice.
No, HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14" 2-in-1 scores higher (49 vs 39).
Apple MacBook Pro is cheaper at $349.99 vs $680 for the HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14" 2-in-1.
Choose the Apple MacBook Pro if budget is your top priority — it offers competitive specs at a lower price point.
Buy the HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14" 2-in-1 if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Apple MacBook Pro has a larger battery (6,753mAh vs 6,000mAh for the HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14" 2-in-1), which generally means longer use between charges.
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14" 2-in-1 lasts longer with 12 hours vs 10 hours for the other.
Apple MacBook Pro has the larger display (15.4" vs 14").
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14" 2-in-1 is lighter at 1470g vs 1800g.
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14" 2-in-1 has more RAM (32GB vs 16GB), which helps with multitasking.
Reviewed by VersusMatrix Editorial Team
Last updated: May 11, 2026
Methodology: AI-powered analysis of technical specifications from manufacturer data. Scores are calculated by comparing products across multiple dimensions and normalized relative to the full category database. Our editorial process is independent and not influenced by affiliate partnerships.