Looking for an honest Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy S22 comparison in 2026? We scored both smartphones on the same six-dimension framework — performance, battery, display, camera, design and value — using identical methodology, so the numbers below are directly comparable. In our overall scoring the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max comes out ahead 57/100 to 51/100 — a 6-point gap. The widest gap is in design and build, where the Samsung Galaxy S22 pulls noticeably ahead. On price the Samsung Galaxy S22 undercuts the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max by 329% ($162.99 vs $699), which materially changes the value calculus for budget-conscious buyers.
Prices may vary · We may earn a commission on purchases. Learn more
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max narrowly beats the Samsung Galaxy S22 in the smartphones category, especially in camera (camera score 135 vs 83), scoring 57 vs 51. If you want the better overall smartphones, Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is the recommended choice.
Picking Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max over Samsung Galaxy S22 means trading these off.
Apple
$699
Scores are relative within the smartphonescategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
| Spec | Apple iPhone 13 Pro MaxW | Samsung Galaxy S22 |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 6.7"✓ | 6.1" |
| Display Type | OLED | Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | — | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz |
| Brightness | 1000nits | 1300nits✓ |
| HDR | — | HDR10+ |
| Protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Chipset | Apple A15 Bionic | Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 |
| CPU | — | Octa-core 2.8 GHz |
| RAM | 6GB | 8GB✓ |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB |
| Storage Options | — | 128GB, 256GB |
| Main Camera | 12MP | 50MP✓ |
| Aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| OIS | — | Yes |
| Video | — | 8K@24fps, 4K@60fps |
| Front Camera | 12MP✓ | 10MP |
| Battery | 4352mAh✓ | 3700mAh |
| Charging | 27W✓ | 25W |
| Wireless Charging | — | 15W |
| OS | iOS 18 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14 |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | — | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | — | USB-C 3.2 |
| Water Resistance | IP68 | IP68 |
| Biometrics | — | Under-display fingerprint |
| Dimensions | — | 146 x 70.6 x 7.6 mm |
| Weight | 238g | 167g✓ |
| Price | 699$ | 162.99$✓ |
Buy Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max if…
Buy the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Buy Samsung Galaxy S22 if…
Choose the Samsung Galaxy S22 if budget is your top priority — it offers competitive specs at a lower price point.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max narrowly beats the Samsung Galaxy S22 in the smartphones category, especially in camera (camera score 135 vs 83), scoring 57 vs 51. If you want the better overall smartphones, Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is the recommended choice.
Yes, Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max scores higher overall (82 vs 76).
Samsung Galaxy S22 is cheaper at $162.99 vs $699 for the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max.
Buy the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Choose the Samsung Galaxy S22 if budget is your top priority — it offers competitive specs at a lower price point.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a larger battery (4,352mAh vs 3,700mAh for the Samsung Galaxy S22), which generally means longer use between charges.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has the larger display (6.7" vs 6.1").
Samsung Galaxy S22 has a higher-resolution main camera (50MP vs 12MP). Note that megapixels are one factor — sensor quality and processing also matter.
Samsung Galaxy S22 is lighter at 167g vs 238g.
Samsung Galaxy S22 has more RAM (8GB vs 6GB), which helps with multitasking.
Reviewed by VersusMatrix Editorial Team
Last updated: May 21, 2026
Methodology: AI-powered analysis of technical specifications from manufacturer data. Scores are calculated by comparing products across multiple dimensions and normalized relative to the full category database. Our editorial process is independent and not influenced by affiliate partnerships.