Looking for an honest Samsung Galaxy A16 4G LTE Phone vs Samsung Galaxy S24 Fe Fully 6.7in comparison in 2026? We scored both smartphones on the same six-dimension framework — performance, battery, display, camera, design and value — using identical methodology, so the numbers below are directly comparable. In our overall scoring the Samsung Galaxy S24 Fe Fully 6.7in comes out ahead 66/100 to 75/100 — a 9-point gap. The widest gap is in display, where the Samsung Galaxy S24 Fe Fully 6.7in pulls noticeably ahead. On price the Samsung Galaxy A16 4G LTE Phone undercuts the Samsung Galaxy S24 Fe Fully 6.7in by 83% ($144.95 vs $265), which materially changes the value calculus for budget-conscious buyers.

Samsung
Prices may vary · We may earn a commission on purchases. Learn more
Samsung Galaxy S24 Fe Fully 6.7in edges out the Samsung Galaxy A16 4G LTE Phone in the smartphones category, especially in display quality, scoring 75 vs 66. If you want the better overall smartphones, Samsung Galaxy S24 Fe Fully 6.7in is the recommended choice.
Picking Samsung Galaxy S24 Fe Fully 6.7in over Samsung Galaxy A16 4G LTE Phone means trading these off.
$145
Scores are relative within the smartphonescategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G LTE Phone | Samsung Galaxy S24 Fe Fully 6.7inW |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 6.5"✓ | 6.2" |
| Display Type | TFT LCD | — |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels | — |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz |
| Brightness | 400nits | — |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| CPU | Octa-core 2.0 GHz | — |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | — |
| RAM | 12GB✓ | 8GB |
| Storage | 512GB✓ | 128GB |
| Storage Options | 64GB, 128GB | — |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | — |
| Front Camera | 8MP | 12MP✓ |
| Battery | 5000mAh✓ | 4000mAh |
| Charging | — | 25W |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 14 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | — |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 | — |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | — |
| Water Resistance | — | IP68 |
| Biometrics | Side-mounted fingerprint | — |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 75.6 x 8.5 mm | — |
| Weight | 185g | 167g✓ |
| Colors | Black, Blue, Red | — |
| Price | 144.95$✓ | 265$ |
Buy Samsung Galaxy A16 4G LTE Phone if…
Choose the Samsung Galaxy A16 4G LTE Phone if budget is your top priority — it offers competitive specs at a lower price point.
Buy Samsung Galaxy S24 Fe Fully 6.7in if…
Buy the Samsung Galaxy S24 Fe Fully 6.7in if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Samsung Galaxy S24 Fe Fully 6.7in edges out the Samsung Galaxy A16 4G LTE Phone in the smartphones category, especially in display quality, scoring 75 vs 66. If you want the better overall smartphones, Samsung Galaxy S24 Fe Fully 6.7in is the recommended choice.
No, Samsung Galaxy S24 Fe Fully 6.7in scores higher (75 vs 66).
Samsung Galaxy A16 4G LTE Phone is cheaper at $144.95 vs $265 for the Samsung Galaxy S24 Fe Fully 6.7in.
Choose the Samsung Galaxy A16 4G LTE Phone if budget is your top priority — it offers competitive specs at a lower price point.
Buy the Samsung Galaxy S24 Fe Fully 6.7in if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Samsung Galaxy A16 4G LTE Phone has a larger battery (5,000mAh vs 4,000mAh for the Samsung Galaxy S24 Fe Fully 6.7in), which generally means longer use between charges.
Samsung Galaxy A16 4G LTE Phone has the larger display (6.5" vs 6.2").
Samsung Galaxy S24 Fe Fully 6.7in is lighter at 167g vs 185g.
Samsung Galaxy A16 4G LTE Phone has more RAM (12GB vs 8GB), which helps with multitasking.
Reviewed by VersusMatrix Editorial Team
Last updated: May 11, 2026
Methodology: AI-powered analysis of technical specifications from manufacturer data. Scores are calculated by comparing products across multiple dimensions and normalized relative to the full category database. Our editorial process is independent and not influenced by affiliate partnerships.