Meta Llama 3.1 70B vs Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B

Name: Meta Llama 3.1 70B
Brand: Meta
SKU: llama-3-1-70b

Looking for an honest Meta Llama 3.1 70B vs Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B comparison in 2026? We scored both ai language models on the same six-dimension framework — performance, battery, display, camera, design and value — using identical methodology, so the numbers below are directly comparable. In our overall scoring the Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B comes out ahead 53/100 to 59/100 — a 6-point gap. The widest gap is in camera quality, where the Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B pulls noticeably ahead.

Llama 3.1 70B

Prices may vary · We may earn a commission on purchases. Learn more

AI Matrix

Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B narrowly beats the Meta Llama 3.1 70B in the ai language models category, especially in camera, scoring 59 vs 53. If you want the better overall ai language models, Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B is the recommended choice.

Reviewed by VersusMatrix Editorial Team|Our methodology

4 Reasons Why Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B Is Better

1.Better performance score: 74 vs 67
2.Higher camera score: 66 vs 51
3.Higher design rating: 33 vs 20
4.Higher overall score: 59 vs 53

Puan Dağılımı

Meta Llama 3.1 70BAlibaba Qwen 2.5 72B

Benchmark (MMLU)30% weight

Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B Kazanan

100

Cost Efficiency20% weight

Beraberlik

Arena ELO20% weight

Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B Kazanan

Context Window10% weight

Beraberlik

Speed (tok/s)10% weight

Beraberlik

Coding (HumanEval)10% weight

Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B Kazanan

Scores are relative within the ai language modelscategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.

Meta Llama 3.1 70B

✗ Cons

●Lower camera score
●Lower performance score

Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B

Kazanan

✓ Pros

●Higher performance score
●Better camera score
●Better design score

💰 Token Pricing (per 1M tokens)

Lower cost = better value. Free = open-source self-hosted.

Metric	3.1 70B	2.5 72B
Input (Prompt)	✓Free/1M	$0.40/1M
Output (Completion)	✓Free/1M	$1.20/1M
Open Source	✓ Free	✓ Free

⚡ Context Window & Speed

Context Window (tokens)

3.1 70B128K

2.5 72B128K

Metric	3.1 70B	2.5 72B
Max Output	4,096 tok	✓8,192 tok
Speed	90 tok/s	90 tok/s
Time to First Token	500ms	500ms
Languages	8+	✓29+

📊 Benchmark Scores

Higher is better. Industry-standard AI evaluation benchmarks.

3.1 70B

2.5 72B

MMLU (Knowledge)

83.6|86.0

3.1 70B

2.5 72B

HumanEval (Coding)

80.5|86.6

3.1 70B

2.5 72B

MATH (Mathematics)

68.0|73.8

3.1 70B

2.5 72B

GPQA (Expert Q&A)

46.7|49.5

3.1 70B

2.5 72B

Chatbot Arena ELO

1203.0|1239.0

3.1 70B

2.5 72B

🔧 Capabilities

Feature	3.1 70B	2.5 72B
Reasoning / Chain-of-Thought	✕	✕
Vision (Image Input)	✕	✕
Audio Input	✕	✕
Video Input	✕	✕
Image/Audio Output	✕	✕
Function Calling / Tools	✓	✓
JSON Mode	✓	✓
Real-time Web Access	✕	✕
Fine-tuning Support	✓	✓
Batch API	✓	✓
Streaming	✓	✓
Open Source	✓	✓

ℹ️ Model Details

Field	3.1 70B	2.5 72B
Provider	Meta	Alibaba
Parameters	70B	72B
Knowledge Cutoff	2023-12	2024-09
License	Llama 3.1 Community	Qwen Community
Best For	open sourceself hostingfine tuningcost efficiency	multilingualcodingopen sourceChinese language

Kim Almalı

Buy Meta Llama 3.1 70B if…

The Meta Llama 3.1 70B is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.

Buy Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B if…

Buy the Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.