LG 50UA7700AUA vs Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED
Looking for an honest LG 50UA7700AUA vs Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED comparison in 2026? We scored both televisions on the same six-dimension framework — performance, battery, display, camera, design and value — using identical methodology, so the numbers below are directly comparable. In our overall scoring the Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED comes out ahead 52/100 to 86/100 — a 34-point gap. The widest gap is in battery life, where the Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED pulls noticeably ahead. On price the LG 50UA7700AUA undercuts the Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED by 41% ($177 vs $250), which materially changes the value calculus for budget-conscious buyers.
LG
50UA7700AUA
Prices may vary · We may earn a commission on purchases. Learn more
AI Matrix
Powered by Claude AISamsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED clearly outperforms the LG 50UA7700AUA in the televisions category, especially in battery life, scoring 86 vs 52. If you want the better overall televisions, Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED is the recommended choice.
5 Reasons Why Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED Is Better
- 1.Smoother display: 120Hz vs 60Hz refresh rate
- 2.Larger screen: 85" vs 50"
- 3.Lighter: 4500g vs 12000g
- 4.Better performance score: 83 vs 33
- 5.Better display rating: 80 vs 27
What are you giving up?
Picking Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED over LG 50UA7700AUA means trading these off.
You give up
- −$73 cheaper ($177 vs $250)
You gain
- +7500g lighter (4500g vs 12000g)
- +Larger screen: 85" vs 50"
- +Smoother display: 120Hz vs 60Hz
