Looking for an honest Garmin Vivosmart 5 vs Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 comparison in 2026? We scored both fitness trackers on the same six-dimension framework — performance, battery, display, camera, design and value — using identical methodology, so the numbers below are directly comparable. In our overall scoring the Garmin Vivosmart 5 comes out ahead 46/100 to 40/100 — a 6-point gap. The widest gap is in display, where the Garmin Vivosmart 5 pulls noticeably ahead. On price the Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 undercuts the Garmin Vivosmart 5 by 40% ($99 vs $139), which materially changes the value calculus for budget-conscious buyers.
Prices may vary · We may earn a commission on purchases. Learn more
Garmin Vivosmart 5 narrowly beats the Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 in the fitness trackers category, especially in display quality, scoring 46 vs 40. If you want the better overall fitness trackers, Garmin Vivosmart 5 is the recommended choice.
Picking Garmin Vivosmart 5 over Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 means trading these off.
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
| Spec | Garmin Vivosmart 5W | Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 1.43"✓ | 1.1" |
| Display Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Heart Rate | true | true |
| SpO2 | true | false |
| ECG | false | false |
| GPS | false |
Buy Garmin Vivosmart 5 if…
Buy the Garmin Vivosmart 5 if you want the best overall value in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Buy Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 if…
Choose the Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 if budget is your top priority — it offers competitive specs at a lower price point.
Garmin Vivosmart 5 narrowly beats the Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 in the fitness trackers category, especially in display quality, scoring 46 vs 40. If you want the better overall fitness trackers, Garmin Vivosmart 5 is the recommended choice.
Yes, Garmin Vivosmart 5 scores higher overall (46 vs 40).
Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 is cheaper at $99 vs $139 for the Garmin Vivosmart 5.
Buy the Garmin Vivosmart 5 if you want the best overall value in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Choose the Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 if budget is your top priority — it offers competitive specs at a lower price point.
Garmin Vivosmart 5 lasts longer with 168 hours vs 120 hours for the other.
Garmin Vivosmart 5 has the larger display (1.43" vs 1.1").
Reviewed by VersusMatrix Editorial Team
Last updated: May 10, 2026
Methodology: AI-powered analysis of technical specifications from manufacturer data. Scores are calculated by comparing products across multiple dimensions and normalized relative to the full category database. Our editorial process is independent and not influenced by affiliate partnerships.
Scores are relative within the fitness trackerscategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.
| false |
| Battery Life | 168hrs✓ | 120hrs |
| NFC | false | false |
| Weight | 24g✓ | 30g |
| Price | 139$ | 99$✓ |
Garmin Vivosmart 5 is lighter at 24g vs 30g.