Looking for an honest Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku vs OpenAI GPT-4o mini comparison in 2026? We scored both ai language models on the same six-dimension framework — performance, battery, display, camera, design and value — using identical methodology, so the numbers below are directly comparable. Both products score nearly identically (65/100 vs 63/100) — this is a genuine toss-up that hinges on which specs matter most for your use case. The widest gap is in performance, where the Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku pulls noticeably ahead.
Anthropic
Prices may vary · We may earn a commission on purchases. Learn more
Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku and OpenAI GPT-4o mini are closely matched ai language models devices with nearly identical overall scores (65 vs 63). The best choice depends on which specific features matter most to you.
Scores are relative within the ai language modelscategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
Lower cost = better value. Free = open-source self-hosted.
| Metric | 3.5 Haiku | GPT-4o mini |
|---|---|---|
| Input (Prompt) | $0.80/1M | ✓$0.15/1M |
| Output (Completion) | $4.00/1M | ✓$0.60/1M |
| Open Source | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Context Window (tokens)
| Metric | 3.5 Haiku | GPT-4o mini |
|---|---|---|
| Max Output | 8,192 tok | ✓16,384 tok |
| Speed | 180 tok/s | ✓220 tok/s |
| Time to First Token | 350ms | ✓280ms |
| Languages | 50+ | 50+ |
Higher is better. Industry-standard AI evaluation benchmarks.
3.5 Haiku
GPT-4o mini
3.5 Haiku
GPT-4o mini
3.5 Haiku
GPT-4o mini
3.5 Haiku
GPT-4o mini
3.5 Haiku
GPT-4o mini
| Feature | 3.5 Haiku | GPT-4o mini |
|---|---|---|
| Reasoning / Chain-of-Thought | ✕ | ✕ |
| Vision (Image Input) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio Input | ✕ | ✕ |
| Video Input | ✕ | ✕ |
| Image/Audio Output | ✕ | ✕ |
| Function Calling / Tools | ✓ | ✓ |
| JSON Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Real-time Web Access | ✕ | ✕ |
| Fine-tuning Support | ✕ | ✓ |
| Batch API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Streaming | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open Source | ✕ | ✕ |
| Field | 3.5 Haiku | GPT-4o mini |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Knowledge Cutoff | 2024-07 | 2023-10 |
| Best For | fast taskshigh volumecost efficiencycoding | high volumecost efficiencysimple tasks |
Buy Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku if…
The Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Buy OpenAI GPT-4o mini if…
The OpenAI GPT-4o mini is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku and OpenAI GPT-4o mini are closely matched ai language models devices with nearly identical overall scores (65 vs 63). The best choice depends on which specific features matter most to you.
Both products score similarly — it depends on your priorities.
Check the latest prices using the buy links above.
The Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
The OpenAI GPT-4o mini is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Reviewed by VersusMatrix Editorial Team
Last updated: April 25, 2026
Methodology: AI-powered analysis of technical specifications from manufacturer data. Scores are calculated by comparing products across multiple dimensions and normalized relative to the full category database. Our editorial process is independent and not influenced by affiliate partnerships.
Who do you think wins this matchup?