Looking for an honest Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku vs OpenAI GPT-3.5 Turbo comparison in 2026? We scored both ai language models on the same six-dimension framework — performance, battery, display, camera, design and value — using identical methodology, so the numbers below are directly comparable. In our overall scoring the Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku comes out ahead 65/100 to 41/100 — a 24-point gap. The widest gap is in performance, where the Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku pulls noticeably ahead.
Prices may vary · We may earn a commission on purchases. Learn more
Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku clearly outperforms the OpenAI GPT-3.5 Turbo in the ai language models category, especially in performance, scoring 65 vs 41. If you want the better overall ai language models, Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku is the recommended choice.
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
Lower cost = better value. Free = open-source self-hosted.
| Metric | 3.5 Haiku | GPT-3.5 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Input (Prompt) | $0.80/1M | ✓$0.50/1M |
| Output (Completion) | $4.00/1M | ✓$1.50/1M |
| Open Source | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Context Window (tokens)
| Metric | 3.5 Haiku | GPT-3.5 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Max Output | ✓8,192 tok | 4,096 tok |
| Speed | 180 tok/s | ✓400 tok/s |
| Time to First Token | 350ms | ✓100ms |
| Languages | 50+ | 50+ |
Higher is better. Industry-standard AI evaluation benchmarks.
3.5 Haiku
GPT-3.5 Turbo
3.5 Haiku
GPT-3.5 Turbo
3.5 Haiku
GPT-3.5 Turbo
3.5 Haiku
GPT-3.5 Turbo
3.5 Haiku
GPT-3.5 Turbo
| Feature | 3.5 Haiku | GPT-3.5 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Reasoning / Chain-of-Thought | ✕ | ✕ |
| Vision (Image Input) | ✓ | ✕ |
| Audio Input | ✕ | ✕ |
| Video Input | ✕ | ✕ |
| Image/Audio Output | ✕ | ✕ |
| Function Calling / Tools | ✓ | ✓ |
| JSON Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Real-time Web Access | ✕ | ✕ |
| Fine-tuning Support | ✕ | ✓ |
| Batch API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Streaming | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open Source | ✕ | ✕ |
| Field | 3.5 Haiku | GPT-3.5 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Knowledge Cutoff | 2024-07 | 2021-09 |
| Best For | fast taskshigh volumecost efficiencycoding | legacysimple taskshigh volumecost efficiency |
Buy Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku if…
Buy the Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Buy OpenAI GPT-3.5 Turbo if…
The OpenAI GPT-3.5 Turbo is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku clearly outperforms the OpenAI GPT-3.5 Turbo in the ai language models category, especially in performance, scoring 65 vs 41. If you want the better overall ai language models, Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku is the recommended choice.
Yes, Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher overall (75 vs 75).
Check the latest prices using the buy links above.
Buy the Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
The OpenAI GPT-3.5 Turbo is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Reviewed by VersusMatrix Editorial Team
Last updated: April 25, 2026
Methodology: AI-powered analysis of technical specifications from manufacturer data. Scores are calculated by comparing products across multiple dimensions and normalized relative to the full category database. Our editorial process is independent and not influenced by affiliate partnerships.
Scores are relative within the ai language modelscategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.