Philips 50pul7552 F7 vs Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED
Looking for an honest Philips 50pul7552 F7 vs Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED comparison in 2026? We scored both televisions on the same six-dimension framework — performance, battery, display, camera, design and value — using identical methodology, so the numbers below are directly comparable. In our overall scoring the Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED comes out ahead 51/100 to 86/100 — a 35-point gap. The widest gap is in battery life, where the Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED pulls noticeably ahead. On price the Philips 50pul7552 F7 undercuts the Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED by 25% ($199.99 vs $250), which materially changes the value calculus for budget-conscious buyers.
Philips
Prices may vary · We may earn a commission on purchases. Learn more
AI Matrix
Powered by Claude AISamsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED clearly outperforms the Philips 50pul7552 F7 in the televisions category, especially in battery life, scoring 86 vs 51. If you want the better overall televisions, Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED is the recommended choice.
5 Reasons Why Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED Is Better
- 1.More RAM: 4GB vs 2GB — better multitasking
- 2.Smoother display: 120Hz vs 60Hz refresh rate
- 3.Larger screen: 85" vs 50"
- 4.Lighter: 4500g vs 12000g
- 5.Better performance score: 83 vs 33
A que você renuncia?
Picking Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED over Philips 50pul7552 F7 means trading these off.
Você renuncia a
- −$50 cheaper ($199.99 vs $250)
You gain
- +7500g lighter (4500g vs 12000g)
- +More RAM: 4GB vs 2GB
- +Larger screen: 85" vs 50"
- +Smoother display: 120Hz vs 60Hz
