Looking for an honest Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2025) XT2515-1 vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5G comparison in 2026? We scored both smartphones on the same six-dimension framework — performance, battery, display, camera, design and value — using identical methodology, so the numbers below are directly comparable. In our overall scoring the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5G comes out ahead 57/100 to 78/100 — a 21-point gap. The widest gap is in camera quality, where the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5G pulls noticeably ahead. On price the Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2025) XT2515-1 undercuts the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5G by 796% ($144.99 vs $1,299), which materially changes the value calculus for budget-conscious buyers.
Prices may vary · We may earn a commission on purchases. Learn more
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5G clearly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2025) XT2515-1 in the smartphones category, especially in camera (camera score 98 vs 63), scoring 78 vs 57. If you want the better overall smartphones, Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5G is the recommended choice.
Picking Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5G over Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2025) XT2515-1 means trading these off.
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
✓ Pros
| Spec | Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2025) XT2515-1 | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5GW |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 6.5" | 6.9"✓ |
| Display Type | IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 2400 x 1080 pixels | — |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz |
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 930 | Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| CPU |
Buy Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2025) XT2515-1 if…
Choose the Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2025) XT2515-1 if budget is your top priority — it offers competitive specs at a lower price point.
Buy Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5G if…
Buy the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5G if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5G clearly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2025) XT2515-1 in the smartphones category, especially in camera (camera score 98 vs 63), scoring 78 vs 57. If you want the better overall smartphones, Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5G is the recommended choice.
No, Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5G scores higher (78 vs 57).
Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2025) XT2515-1 is cheaper at $144.99 vs $1299 for the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5G.
Choose the Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2025) XT2515-1 if budget is your top priority — it offers competitive specs at a lower price point.
Buy the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5G if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Both have the same 5000mAh battery.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5G has the larger display (6.9" vs 6.5").
Reviewed by VersusMatrix Editorial Team
Last updated: May 10, 2026
Methodology: AI-powered analysis of technical specifications from manufacturer data. Scores are calculated by comparing products across multiple dimensions and normalized relative to the full category database. Our editorial process is independent and not influenced by affiliate partnerships.
Scores are relative within the smartphonescategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.
✗ Cons
| Octa-core 2.2 GHz |
| — |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC2 | — |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB |
| Storage | 512GB✓ | 256GB |
| Storage Options | 128GB, 256GB | — |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 200MP✓ |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | — |
| Front Camera | 16MP✓ | 12MP |
| Battery | 5000mAh | 5000mAh |
| Charging | — | 45W |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) | — |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.3 | — |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | — |
| Water Resistance | — | IP68 |
| Dimensions | 162.8 x 75.9 x 8.5 mm | — |
| Weight | 203g✓ | 218g |
| Colors | Black, White, Blue | — |
| Price | 144.99$ | 1299$ |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5G has a higher-resolution main camera (200MP vs 50MP). Note that megapixels are one factor — sensor quality and processing also matter.
Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2025) XT2515-1 is lighter at 203g vs 218g.