Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 (75) vs OpenAI GPT-4o (75) (2026): qual é melhor?

Name: Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6
Brand: Anthropic
SKU: claude-sonnet-4-6

AI Matrix

Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 edges out the OpenAI GPT-4o in the ai language models category, especially in design, scoring 79 vs 67. If you want the better overall ai language models, Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 is the recommended choice.

Reviewed by VersusMatrix Editorial Team|Our methodology

5 Reasons Why Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 Is Better

1.Better performance score: 94 vs 82
2.Higher camera score: 90 vs 76
3.Better battery score: 19 vs 12
4.Higher design rating: 100 vs 61
5.Higher overall score: 79 vs 67

Comparação de Especificações

Detalhamento da Pontuação

Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6OpenAI GPT-4o

Benchmark (MMLU)30% weight

Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 Vencedor

Cost Efficiency20% weight

Empate

Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6

Vencedor

✓ Pros

●Higher performance score
●Better battery score
●Better camera score

✗ Cons

●Lower display score

OpenAI GPT-4o

✓ Pros

●Better display score

✗ Cons

●Weaker battery score
●Lower camera score
●Lower performance score

💰 Token Pricing (per 1M tokens)

Lower cost = better value. Free = open-source self-hosted.

Metric	Sonnet 4.6	OpenAI GPT-4o
Input (Prompt)	$3.00/1M	✓$2.50/1M
Output (Completion)	$15.00/1M	✓$10.00/1M
Open Source	Proprietary	Proprietary

⚡ Context Window & Speed

Context Window (tokens)

Sonnet 4.6200K

OpenAI GPT-4o128K

Metric	Sonnet 4.6	OpenAI GPT-4o
Max Output	16,000 tok	✓16,384 tok
Speed	100 tok/s	✓120 tok/s
Time to First Token	500ms	500ms
Languages	50+	50+

📊 Benchmark Scores

Higher is better. Industry-standard AI evaluation benchmarks.

Sonnet 4.6

OpenAI GPT-4o

MMLU (Knowledge)

93.0|88.7

Sonnet 4.6

OpenAI GPT-4o

HumanEval (Coding)

96.0|90.2

Sonnet 4.6

OpenAI GPT-4o

MATH (Mathematics)

86.0|76.6

Sonnet 4.6

OpenAI GPT-4o

GPQA (Expert Q&A)

88.0|53.6

Sonnet 4.6

OpenAI GPT-4o

Chatbot Arena ELO

1420.0|1314.0

Sonnet 4.6

OpenAI GPT-4o

🔧 Capabilities

Feature	Sonnet 4.6	OpenAI GPT-4o
Reasoning / Chain-of-Thought	✓	✕
Vision (Image Input)	✓	✓
Audio Input	✕	✓
Video Input	✕	✕
Image/Audio Output	✕	✓
Function Calling / Tools	✓	✓
JSON Mode	✓	✓
Real-time Web Access	✕	✕
Fine-tuning Support	✕	✓
Batch API	✓	✓
Streaming	✓	✓
Open Source	✕	✕

ℹ️ Model Details

Field	Sonnet 4.6	OpenAI GPT-4o
Provider	Anthropic	OpenAI
Knowledge Cutoff	2025-07	2024-04
Best For	codingreasoninganalysiswritingagents	generalcodingvisionmultimodal

Quem Deve Comprar

Buy Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 if…

Buy the Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.

Buy OpenAI GPT-4o if…

The OpenAI GPT-4o is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.

Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs OpenAI GPT-4o — FAQ

Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs OpenAI GPT-4o: which is better?

Is Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 better than OpenAI GPT-4o?

Yes, Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores higher overall (75 vs 75).

Which is cheaper, Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 or OpenAI GPT-4o?

Check the latest prices using the buy links above.

Who should buy the Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6?

Buy the Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.

Who should buy the OpenAI GPT-4o?

The OpenAI GPT-4o is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.

Comparações Relacionadas

Google Gemini 2.0 Flash

OpenAI GPT-4o

Anthropic Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Google Gemini 2.0 Flash

OpenAI o1

Google Gemini 2.5 Pro

Full Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 review →Full OpenAI GPT-4o review →All Anthropic AI Language Models →All OpenAI AI Language Models →

Reviewed by VersusMatrix Editorial Team

Last updated: June 1, 2026

Editorial guidelines

Methodology: AI-powered analysis of technical specifications from manufacturer data. Scores are calculated by comparing products across multiple dimensions and normalized relative to the full category database. Our editorial process is independent and not influenced by affiliate partnerships.