Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H95 vs Sennheiser HD 660s2
Prices may vary · We may earn a commission on purchases. Learn more
AI Matrix
Powered by Claude AIBang & Olufsen Beoplay H95 clearly outperforms the Sennheiser HD 660s2 in the headphones category, especially in design, scoring 56 vs 24. If you want the better overall headphones, Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H95 is the recommended choice.
4 Reasons Why Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H95 Is Better
- 1.Better performance score: 100 vs 35
- 2.Better display rating: 37 vs 30
- 3.Higher design rating: 100 vs 0
- 4.Higher overall score: 56 vs 24
What are you giving up?
Picking Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H95 over Sennheiser HD 660s2 means trading these off.
You give up
- −$201 cheaper ($599 vs $800)
- −40g lighter (260g vs 300g)
You gain
Specs are roughly matched — winner decided on overall scoring, not a specific spec advantage.
Comparação de Especificações
Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H95Sennheiser HD 660s2
Detalhamento da Pontuação
Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H95Sennheiser HD 660s2
0
Price20% weight
0Empate
100
Codec Quality25% weight
35Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H95 Vencedor
37
Battery Life20% weight
35Empate
100
Noise Cancellation15% weight
0Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H95 Vencedor
37
Driver Size10% weight
30Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H95 Vencedor
50
Water Resistance10% weight
50Empate
Scores are relative within the headphonescategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.
Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H95
Vencedor✓ Pros
- ●Higher performance score
- ●Better display score
- ●Better design score
✗ Cons
- ●Higher price: $800 vs $599
Sennheiser HD 660s2
✓ Pros
- ●Lower price: $599 vs $800
- ●Lighter build: 260g vs 300g
✗ Cons
- ●Lower display score
- ●Lower performance score
Comparação de Especificações
| Spec | Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H95W | Sennheiser HD 660s2 |
|---|---|---|
| Driver Size | 40mm✓ | 38mm |
| ANC | true | — |
| Transparency Mode | true | — |
| Voice Assistant | Google, Alexa | — |
| Battery Life | 38hrs | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | — |
| Codecs | AAC, SBC, aptX | — |
| Multipoint | true | — |
| Foldable | true | — |
| Weight | 300g | 260g✓ |
| Colors | Black, Grey | — |
| Price | 800$ | 599$✓ |
Quem Deve Comprar
Buy Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H95 if…
Buy the Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H95 if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Buy Sennheiser HD 660s2 if…
The Sennheiser HD 660s2 is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H95 vs Sennheiser HD 660s2 — FAQ
Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H95 vs Sennheiser HD 660s2: which is better?
Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H95 clearly outperforms the Sennheiser HD 660s2 in the headphones category, especially in design, scoring 56 vs 24. If you want the better overall headphones, Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H95 is the recommended choice.
Is Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H95 better than Sennheiser HD 660s2?
Yes, Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H95 scores higher overall (81 vs 22).
Which is cheaper, Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H95 or Sennheiser HD 660s2?
Sennheiser HD 660s2 is cheaper at $599 vs $800 for the Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H95.
Who should buy the Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H95?
Buy the Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H95 if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Who should buy the Sennheiser HD 660s2?
The Sennheiser HD 660s2 is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Which is lighter, Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H95 or Sennheiser HD 660s2?
Sennheiser HD 660s2 is lighter at 260g vs 300g.
Comparações Relacionadas
Full Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H95 review →Full Sennheiser HD 660s2 review →All Bang & Olufsen Headphones →All Sennheiser Headphones →
Reviewed by VersusMatrix Editorial Team
Last updated: April 28, 2026
Methodology: AI-powered analysis of technical specifications from manufacturer data. Scores are calculated by comparing products across multiple dimensions and normalized relative to the full category database. Our editorial process is independent and not influenced by affiliate partnerships.