xAI Grok 2 vs Microsoft Phi-4
AI Matrix
Powered by Claude AIxAI Grok 2 and Microsoft Phi-4 are closely matched ai language models devices with nearly identical overall scores (6.3 vs 6.0). The best choice depends on which specific features matter most to you.
Comparaison des caractéristiques
xAI Grok 2Microsoft Phi-4
Détail du score
xAI Grok 2Microsoft Phi-4
9.0
Cost Efficiency20% weight
10.0Microsoft Phi-4 Gagnant
7.9
Benchmark (MMLU)30% weight
7.1xAI Grok 2 Gagnant
5.2
Arena ELO20% weight
2.3xAI Grok 2 Gagnant
1.2
Context Window10% weight
0.1xAI Grok 2 Gagnant
2.9
Speed (tok/s)10% weight
8.2Microsoft Phi-4 Gagnant
7.1
Coding (HumanEval)10% weight
5.6xAI Grok 2 Gagnant
Scores are relative within the ai language modelscategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.
xAI Grok 2
✓ Pros
- ●Strong performance score
- ●Superior battery life
- ●Higher camera score
✗ Cons
- ●Higher price tag
- ●Lower display score
Microsoft Phi-4
✓ Pros
- ●Better display quality
- ●Better value for money
✗ Cons
- ●Shorter battery life
- ●Lower camera score
- ●Lower performance score
💰 Token Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Lower cost = better value. Free = open-source self-hosted.
| Metric | Grok 2 | Microsoft Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| Input (Prompt) | $2.00/1M | ✓$0.07/1M |
| Output (Completion) | $10.00/1M | ✓$0.26/1M |
| Open Source | Proprietary | ✓ Free |
⚡ Context Window & Speed
Context Window (tokens)
Grok 2131K
Microsoft Phi-416K
| Metric | Grok 2 | Microsoft Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Output | 4,096 tok | 4,096 tok |
| Speed | 100 tok/s | ✓250 tok/s |
| Time to First Token | 600ms | ✓150ms |
| Languages | ✓25+ | 15+ |
📊 Benchmark Scores
Higher is better. Industry-standard AI evaluation benchmarks.
Grok 2
Microsoft Phi-4
MMLU (Knowledge)
87.5|84.8
Grok 2
Microsoft Phi-4
HumanEval (Coding)
88.4|82.6
Grok 2
Microsoft Phi-4
MATH (Mathematics)
76.1|80.4
Grok 2
Microsoft Phi-4
GPQA (Expert Q&A)
56.0|56.1
Grok 2
Microsoft Phi-4
Chatbot Arena ELO
1290.0|1213.0
Grok 2
Microsoft Phi-4
🔧 Capabilities
| Feature | Grok 2 | Microsoft Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| Reasoning / Chain-of-Thought | ✕ | ✕ |
| Vision (Image Input) | ✓ | ✕ |
| Audio Input | ✕ | ✕ |
| Video Input | ✕ | ✕ |
| Image/Audio Output | ✕ | ✕ |
| Function Calling / Tools | ✓ | ✕ |
| JSON Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Real-time Web Access | ✓ | ✕ |
| Fine-tuning Support | ✕ | ✓ |
| Batch API | ✕ | ✓ |
| Streaming | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open Source | ✕ | ✓ |
ℹ️ Model Details
| Field | Grok 2 | Microsoft Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Microsoft |
| Parameters | — | 14B |
| Knowledge Cutoff | real-time | 2024-06 |
| License | Commercial | MIT |
| Best For | current eventsresearchreal time infogeneral | edge deploymentSTEMcost efficiencymathsmall footprint |
Qui devrait acheter
Buy xAI Grok 2 if…
The xAI Grok 2 is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Buy Microsoft Phi-4 if…
Choose the Microsoft Phi-4 if budget is your top priority — it offers competitive specs at a lower price point.
Community Vote
Who do you think wins this matchup?
xAI Grok 2 vs Microsoft Phi-4 — FAQ
xAI Grok 2 vs Microsoft Phi-4: which is better?
xAI Grok 2 and Microsoft Phi-4 are closely matched ai language models devices with nearly identical overall scores (6.3 vs 6.0). The best choice depends on which specific features matter most to you.
Is xAI Grok 2 better than Microsoft Phi-4?
Both products score similarly — it depends on your priorities.
Which is cheaper, xAI Grok 2 or Microsoft Phi-4?
Check the latest prices using the buy links above.
Who should buy the xAI Grok 2?
The xAI Grok 2 is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Who should buy the Microsoft Phi-4?
Choose the Microsoft Phi-4 if budget is your top priority — it offers competitive specs at a lower price point.
