OpenAI GPT-4o mini vs Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B
AI Matrix
Powered by Claude AIOpenAI GPT-4o mini narrowly beats the Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B in the ai language models category, particularly in display, scoring 6.3/10 vs 5.9/10. If you want the better overall performer, OpenAI GPT-4o mini is the clear pick.
3 Reasons Why OpenAI GPT-4o mini Is Better
- 1.Better display rating: 7.1 vs 2.5
- 2.Higher design rating: 4.5 vs 3.3
- 3.Higher overall score: 6.3/10 vs 5.9/10
Comparaison des caractéristiques
OpenAI GPT-4o miniAlibaba Qwen 2.5 72B
Détail du score
OpenAI GPT-4o miniAlibaba Qwen 2.5 72B
9.9
Cost Efficiency20% weight
9.8Égalité
6.3
Benchmark (MMLU)30% weight
7.4Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B Gagnant
4.5
Arena ELO20% weight
3.3OpenAI GPT-4o mini Gagnant
1.2
Context Window10% weight
1.2Égalité
7.1
Speed (tok/s)10% weight
2.5OpenAI GPT-4o mini Gagnant
6.8
Coding (HumanEval)10% weight
6.6Égalité
Scores are relative within the ai language modelscategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.
OpenAI GPT-4o mini
Gagnant✓ Pros
- ●Better display quality
- ●Better build and design
✗ Cons
- ●Lower performance score
Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B
✓ Pros
- ●Strong performance score
✗ Cons
- ●Lower display score
💰 Token Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Lower cost = better value. Free = open-source self-hosted.
| Metric | GPT-4o mini | 2.5 72B |
|---|---|---|
| Input (Prompt) | ✓$0.15/1M | $0.40/1M |
| Output (Completion) | ✓$0.60/1M | $1.20/1M |
| Open Source | Proprietary | ✓ Free |
⚡ Context Window & Speed
Context Window (tokens)
GPT-4o mini128K
2.5 72B128K
| Metric | GPT-4o mini | 2.5 72B |
|---|---|---|
| Max Output | ✓16,384 tok | 8,192 tok |
| Speed | ✓220 tok/s | 90 tok/s |
| Time to First Token | ✓280ms | 500ms |
| Languages | ✓50+ | 29+ |
📊 Benchmark Scores
Higher is better. Industry-standard AI evaluation benchmarks.
GPT-4o mini
2.5 72B
MMLU (Knowledge)
82.0|86.0
GPT-4o mini
2.5 72B
HumanEval (Coding)
87.2|86.6
GPT-4o mini
2.5 72B
MATH (Mathematics)
70.2|73.8
GPT-4o mini
2.5 72B
GPQA (Expert Q&A)
40.2|49.5
GPT-4o mini
2.5 72B
Chatbot Arena ELO
1272.0|1239.0
GPT-4o mini
2.5 72B
🔧 Capabilities
| Feature | GPT-4o mini | 2.5 72B |
|---|---|---|
| Reasoning / Chain-of-Thought | ✕ | ✕ |
| Vision (Image Input) | ✓ | ✕ |
| Audio Input | ✕ | ✕ |
| Video Input | ✕ | ✕ |
| Image/Audio Output | ✕ | ✕ |
| Function Calling / Tools | ✓ | ✓ |
| JSON Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Real-time Web Access | ✕ | ✕ |
| Fine-tuning Support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Batch API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Streaming | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open Source | ✕ | ✓ |
ℹ️ Model Details
| Field | GPT-4o mini | 2.5 72B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba |
| Parameters | — | 72B |
| Knowledge Cutoff | 2023-10 | 2024-09 |
| License | Commercial | Qwen Community |
| Best For | high volumecost efficiencysimple tasks | multilingualcodingopen sourceChinese language |
Qui devrait acheter
Buy OpenAI GPT-4o mini if…
Buy the OpenAI GPT-4o mini if you want the best overall value in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Buy Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B if…
The Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
OpenAI GPT-4o mini vs Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B — FAQ
OpenAI GPT-4o mini vs Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B: which is better?
OpenAI GPT-4o mini narrowly beats the Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B in the ai language models category, particularly in display, scoring 6.3/10 vs 5.9/10. If you want the better overall performer, OpenAI GPT-4o mini is the clear pick.
Is OpenAI GPT-4o mini better than Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B?
Yes, OpenAI GPT-4o mini scores higher overall (8.3 vs 8.4).
Which is cheaper, OpenAI GPT-4o mini or Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B?
Check the latest prices using the buy links above.
Who should buy the OpenAI GPT-4o mini?
Buy the OpenAI GPT-4o mini if you want the best overall value in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Who should buy the Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B?
The Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
