OpenAI GPT-4o mini vs Microsoft Phi-4
AI Matrix
Powered by Claude AIOpenAI GPT-4o mini and Microsoft Phi-4 are closely matched ai language models devices with nearly identical overall scores (6.3 vs 6.0). The best choice depends on which specific features matter most to you.
Comparaison des caractéristiques
OpenAI GPT-4o miniMicrosoft Phi-4
Détail du score
OpenAI GPT-4o miniMicrosoft Phi-4
9.9
Cost Efficiency20% weight
10.0Égalité
6.3
Benchmark (MMLU)30% weight
7.1Microsoft Phi-4 Gagnant
4.5
Arena ELO20% weight
2.3OpenAI GPT-4o mini Gagnant
1.2
Context Window10% weight
0.1OpenAI GPT-4o mini Gagnant
7.1
Speed (tok/s)10% weight
8.2Microsoft Phi-4 Gagnant
6.8
Coding (HumanEval)10% weight
5.6OpenAI GPT-4o mini Gagnant
Scores are relative within the ai language modelscategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.
OpenAI GPT-4o mini
✓ Pros
- ●Superior battery life
- ●Higher camera score
- ●Better build and design
✗ Cons
- ●Lower display score
- ●Lower performance score
Microsoft Phi-4
✓ Pros
- ●Strong performance score
- ●Better display quality
✗ Cons
- ●Shorter battery life
- ●Lower camera score
💰 Token Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Lower cost = better value. Free = open-source self-hosted.
| Metric | GPT-4o mini | Microsoft Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| Input (Prompt) | $0.15/1M | ✓$0.07/1M |
| Output (Completion) | $0.60/1M | ✓$0.26/1M |
| Open Source | Proprietary | ✓ Free |
⚡ Context Window & Speed
Context Window (tokens)
GPT-4o mini128K
Microsoft Phi-416K
| Metric | GPT-4o mini | Microsoft Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Output | ✓16,384 tok | 4,096 tok |
| Speed | 220 tok/s | ✓250 tok/s |
| Time to First Token | 280ms | ✓150ms |
| Languages | ✓50+ | 15+ |
📊 Benchmark Scores
Higher is better. Industry-standard AI evaluation benchmarks.
GPT-4o mini
Microsoft Phi-4
MMLU (Knowledge)
82.0|84.8
GPT-4o mini
Microsoft Phi-4
HumanEval (Coding)
87.2|82.6
GPT-4o mini
Microsoft Phi-4
MATH (Mathematics)
70.2|80.4
GPT-4o mini
Microsoft Phi-4
GPQA (Expert Q&A)
40.2|56.1
GPT-4o mini
Microsoft Phi-4
Chatbot Arena ELO
1272.0|1213.0
GPT-4o mini
Microsoft Phi-4
🔧 Capabilities
| Feature | GPT-4o mini | Microsoft Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| Reasoning / Chain-of-Thought | ✕ | ✕ |
| Vision (Image Input) | ✓ | ✕ |
| Audio Input | ✕ | ✕ |
| Video Input | ✕ | ✕ |
| Image/Audio Output | ✕ | ✕ |
| Function Calling / Tools | ✓ | ✕ |
| JSON Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Real-time Web Access | ✕ | ✕ |
| Fine-tuning Support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Batch API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Streaming | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open Source | ✕ | ✓ |
ℹ️ Model Details
| Field | GPT-4o mini | Microsoft Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Microsoft |
| Parameters | — | 14B |
| Knowledge Cutoff | 2023-10 | 2024-06 |
| License | Commercial | MIT |
| Best For | high volumecost efficiencysimple tasks | edge deploymentSTEMcost efficiencymathsmall footprint |
Qui devrait acheter
Buy OpenAI GPT-4o mini if…
The OpenAI GPT-4o mini is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Buy Microsoft Phi-4 if…
The Microsoft Phi-4 is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Community Vote
Who do you think wins this matchup?
OpenAI GPT-4o mini vs Microsoft Phi-4 — FAQ
OpenAI GPT-4o mini vs Microsoft Phi-4: which is better?
OpenAI GPT-4o mini and Microsoft Phi-4 are closely matched ai language models devices with nearly identical overall scores (6.3 vs 6.0). The best choice depends on which specific features matter most to you.
Is OpenAI GPT-4o mini better than Microsoft Phi-4?
Both products score similarly — it depends on your priorities.
Which is cheaper, OpenAI GPT-4o mini or Microsoft Phi-4?
Check the latest prices using the buy links above.
Who should buy the OpenAI GPT-4o mini?
The OpenAI GPT-4o mini is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Who should buy the Microsoft Phi-4?
The Microsoft Phi-4 is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
