Google Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Google Gemini 2.5 Pro
AI Matrix
Powered by Claude AIGoogle Gemini 2.5 Pro edges out the Google Gemini 1.5 Pro in the ai language models category, particularly in design, scoring 8.4/10 vs 7.0/10. If you want the better overall performer, Google Gemini 2.5 Pro is the clear pick.
4 Reasons Why Google Gemini 2.5 Pro Is Better
- 1.Better performance score: 9.1 vs 7.4
- 2.Higher camera score: 8.0 vs 6.0
- 3.Higher design rating: 8.5 vs 5.1
- 4.Higher overall score: 8.4/10 vs 7.0/10
Comparaison des caractéristiques
Google Gemini 1.5 ProGoogle Gemini 2.5 Pro
Détail du score
Google Gemini 1.5 ProGoogle Gemini 2.5 Pro
9.4
Cost Efficiency20% weight
9.4Égalité
7.4
Benchmark (MMLU)30% weight
9.1Google Gemini 2.5 Pro Gagnant
5.1
Arena ELO20% weight
8.5Google Gemini 2.5 Pro Gagnant
10.0
Context Window10% weight
10.0Égalité
3.2
Speed (tok/s)10% weight
2.9Égalité
6.0
Coding (HumanEval)10% weight
8.0Google Gemini 2.5 Pro Gagnant
Scores are relative within the ai language modelscategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.
Google Gemini 1.5 Pro
✗ Cons
- ●Lower camera score
- ●Lower performance score
Google Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gagnant✓ Pros
- ●Top-rated Google Gemini with 8.4/10 score
- ●Strong performance score
- ●Higher camera score
- ●Better build and design
💰 Token Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Lower cost = better value. Free = open-source self-hosted.
| Metric | 1.5 Pro | 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Input (Prompt) | $1.25/1M | $1.25/1M |
| Output (Completion) | ✓$5.00/1M | $10.00/1M |
| Open Source | Proprietary | Proprietary |
⚡ Context Window & Speed
Context Window (tokens)
1.5 Pro1M
2.5 Pro1M
| Metric | 1.5 Pro | 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Max Output | 8,192 tok | ✓65,536 tok |
| Speed | ✓110 tok/s | 100 tok/s |
| Time to First Token | ✓700ms | 800ms |
| Languages | 40+ | 40+ |
📊 Benchmark Scores
Higher is better. Industry-standard AI evaluation benchmarks.
1.5 Pro
2.5 Pro
MMLU (Knowledge)
85.9|92.0
1.5 Pro
2.5 Pro
HumanEval (Coding)
84.1|92.0
1.5 Pro
2.5 Pro
MATH (Mathematics)
67.7|86.7
1.5 Pro
2.5 Pro
GPQA (Expert Q&A)
46.2|84.0
1.5 Pro
2.5 Pro
Chatbot Arena ELO
1287.0|1380.0
1.5 Pro
2.5 Pro
🔧 Capabilities
| Feature | 1.5 Pro | 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Reasoning / Chain-of-Thought | ✕ | ✓ |
| Vision (Image Input) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio Input | ✓ | ✓ |
| Video Input | ✓ | ✓ |
| Image/Audio Output | ✕ | ✕ |
| Function Calling / Tools | ✓ | ✓ |
| JSON Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Real-time Web Access | ✕ | ✓ |
| Fine-tuning Support | ✕ | ✕ |
| Batch API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Streaming | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open Source | ✕ | ✕ |
ℹ️ Model Details
| Field | 1.5 Pro | 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Knowledge Cutoff | 2023-11 | 2025-01 |
| Best For | long contextdocument analysisvideogeneral | reasoningcodingmultimodallong contextmath |
Qui devrait acheter
Buy Google Gemini 1.5 Pro if…
The Google Gemini 1.5 Pro is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Buy Google Gemini 2.5 Pro if…
Buy the Google Gemini 2.5 Pro if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Google Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Google Gemini 2.5 Pro — FAQ
Google Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Google Gemini 2.5 Pro: which is better?
Google Gemini 2.5 Pro edges out the Google Gemini 1.5 Pro in the ai language models category, particularly in design, scoring 8.4/10 vs 7.0/10. If you want the better overall performer, Google Gemini 2.5 Pro is the clear pick.
Is Google Gemini 1.5 Pro better than Google Gemini 2.5 Pro?
No, Google Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher (9.5 vs 8.9).
Which is cheaper, Google Gemini 1.5 Pro or Google Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Check the latest prices using the buy links above.
Who should buy the Google Gemini 1.5 Pro?
The Google Gemini 1.5 Pro is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Who should buy the Google Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Buy the Google Gemini 2.5 Pro if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
