DeepSeek V3 vs Meta Llama 3.1 405B
AI Matrix
Powered by Claude AIDeepSeek V3 and Meta Llama 3.1 405B are closely matched ai language models devices with nearly identical overall scores (6.5 vs 6.2). The best choice depends on which specific features matter most to you.
Comparaison des caractéristiques
DeepSeek V3Meta Llama 3.1 405B
Détail du score
DeepSeek V3Meta Llama 3.1 405B
9.9
Cost Efficiency20% weight
10.0Égalité
8.1
Benchmark (MMLU)30% weight
8.2Égalité
6.2
Arena ELO20% weight
4.4DeepSeek V3 Gagnant
1.2
Context Window10% weight
1.2Égalité
1.4
Speed (tok/s)10% weight
0.4DeepSeek V3 Gagnant
5.6
Coding (HumanEval)10% weight
7.3Meta Llama 3.1 405B Gagnant
Scores are relative within the ai language modelscategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.
DeepSeek V3
✓ Pros
- ●Better display quality
- ●Better build and design
✗ Cons
- ●Lower camera score
Meta Llama 3.1 405B
✓ Pros
- ●Higher camera score
✗ Cons
- ●Lower display score
💰 Token Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Lower cost = better value. Free = open-source self-hosted.
| Metric | DeepSeek V3 | 3.1 405B |
|---|---|---|
| Input (Prompt) | $0.27/1M | ✓Free/1M |
| Output (Completion) | $1.10/1M | ✓Free/1M |
| Open Source | ✓ Free | ✓ Free |
⚡ Context Window & Speed
Context Window (tokens)
DeepSeek V3128K
3.1 405B128K
| Metric | DeepSeek V3 | 3.1 405B |
|---|---|---|
| Max Output | ✓8,192 tok | 4,096 tok |
| Speed | ✓60 tok/s | 30 tok/s |
| Time to First Token | ✓800ms | 1.5s |
| Languages | ✓20+ | 8+ |
📊 Benchmark Scores
Higher is better. Industry-standard AI evaluation benchmarks.
DeepSeek V3
3.1 405B
MMLU (Knowledge)
88.5|88.6
DeepSeek V3
3.1 405B
HumanEval (Coding)
82.6|89.0
DeepSeek V3
3.1 405B
MATH (Mathematics)
75.7|73.8
DeepSeek V3
3.1 405B
GPQA (Expert Q&A)
59.1|51.1
DeepSeek V3
3.1 405B
Chatbot Arena ELO
1318.0|1270.0
DeepSeek V3
3.1 405B
🔧 Capabilities
| Feature | DeepSeek V3 | 3.1 405B |
|---|---|---|
| Reasoning / Chain-of-Thought | ✕ | ✕ |
| Vision (Image Input) | ✕ | ✕ |
| Audio Input | ✕ | ✕ |
| Video Input | ✕ | ✕ |
| Image/Audio Output | ✕ | ✕ |
| Function Calling / Tools | ✓ | ✓ |
| JSON Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Real-time Web Access | ✕ | ✕ |
| Fine-tuning Support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Batch API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Streaming | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open Source | ✓ | ✓ |
ℹ️ Model Details
| Field | DeepSeek V3 | 3.1 405B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Meta |
| Parameters | 671B (37B active) | 405B |
| Knowledge Cutoff | 2024-07 | 2023-12 |
| License | MIT | Llama 3.1 Community |
| Best For | cost efficiencycodingopen sourcegeneral | open sourceself hostingfine tuningenterprise privacy |
Qui devrait acheter
Buy DeepSeek V3 if…
The DeepSeek V3 is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Buy Meta Llama 3.1 405B if…
The Meta Llama 3.1 405B is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
DeepSeek V3 vs Meta Llama 3.1 405B — FAQ
DeepSeek V3 vs Meta Llama 3.1 405B: which is better?
DeepSeek V3 and Meta Llama 3.1 405B are closely matched ai language models devices with nearly identical overall scores (6.5 vs 6.2). The best choice depends on which specific features matter most to you.
Is DeepSeek V3 better than Meta Llama 3.1 405B?
Both products score similarly — it depends on your priorities.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3 or Meta Llama 3.1 405B?
Check the latest prices using the buy links above.
Who should buy the DeepSeek V3?
The DeepSeek V3 is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Who should buy the Meta Llama 3.1 405B?
The Meta Llama 3.1 405B is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
