DeepSeek R1 vs Google Gemini 1.5 Pro
AI Matrix
Powered by Claude AIDeepSeek R1 and Google Gemini 1.5 Pro are closely matched ai language models devices with nearly identical overall scores (7.1 vs 7.0). The best choice depends on which specific features matter most to you.
Comparaison des caractéristiques
DeepSeek R1Google Gemini 1.5 Pro
Détail du score
DeepSeek R1Google Gemini 1.5 Pro
9.7
Cost Efficiency20% weight
9.4Égalité
8.8
Benchmark (MMLU)30% weight
7.4DeepSeek R1 Gagnant
7.7
Arena ELO20% weight
5.1DeepSeek R1 Gagnant
1.2
Context Window10% weight
10.0Google Gemini 1.5 Pro Gagnant
0.2
Speed (tok/s)10% weight
3.2Google Gemini 1.5 Pro Gagnant
8.1
Coding (HumanEval)10% weight
6.0DeepSeek R1 Gagnant
Scores are relative within the ai language modelscategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.
DeepSeek R1
✓ Pros
- ●Strong performance score
- ●Higher camera score
- ●Better build and design
✗ Cons
- ●Shorter battery life
- ●Lower display score
Google Gemini 1.5 Pro
✓ Pros
- ●Better display quality
- ●Superior battery life
✗ Cons
- ●Lower camera score
- ●Lower performance score
💰 Token Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Lower cost = better value. Free = open-source self-hosted.
| Metric | DeepSeek R1 | 1.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Input (Prompt) | ✓$0.55/1M | $1.25/1M |
| Output (Completion) | ✓$2.19/1M | $5.00/1M |
| Open Source | ✓ Free | Proprietary |
⚡ Context Window & Speed
Context Window (tokens)
DeepSeek R1128K
1.5 Pro1M
| Metric | DeepSeek R1 | 1.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Max Output | ✓32,768 tok | 8,192 tok |
| Speed | 25 tok/s | ✓110 tok/s |
| Time to First Token | 3.0s | ✓700ms |
| Languages | 20+ | ✓40+ |
📊 Benchmark Scores
Higher is better. Industry-standard AI evaluation benchmarks.
DeepSeek R1
1.5 Pro
MMLU (Knowledge)
90.8|85.9
DeepSeek R1
1.5 Pro
HumanEval (Coding)
92.6|84.1
DeepSeek R1
1.5 Pro
MATH (Mathematics)
97.3|67.7
DeepSeek R1
1.5 Pro
GPQA (Expert Q&A)
71.5|46.2
DeepSeek R1
1.5 Pro
Chatbot Arena ELO
1358.0|1287.0
DeepSeek R1
1.5 Pro
🔧 Capabilities
| Feature | DeepSeek R1 | 1.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Reasoning / Chain-of-Thought | ✓ | ✕ |
| Vision (Image Input) | ✕ | ✓ |
| Audio Input | ✕ | ✓ |
| Video Input | ✕ | ✓ |
| Image/Audio Output | ✕ | ✕ |
| Function Calling / Tools | ✕ | ✓ |
| JSON Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Real-time Web Access | ✕ | ✕ |
| Fine-tuning Support | ✓ | ✕ |
| Batch API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Streaming | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open Source | ✓ | ✕ |
ℹ️ Model Details
| Field | DeepSeek R1 | 1.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | |
| Parameters | 671B (37B active) | — |
| Knowledge Cutoff | 2024-07 | 2023-11 |
| License | MIT | Commercial |
| Best For | reasoningmathscienceopen sourcecost efficiency | long contextdocument analysisvideogeneral |
Qui devrait acheter
Buy DeepSeek R1 if…
The DeepSeek R1 is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Buy Google Gemini 1.5 Pro if…
The Google Gemini 1.5 Pro is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Community Vote
Who do you think wins this matchup?
DeepSeek R1 vs Google Gemini 1.5 Pro — FAQ
DeepSeek R1 vs Google Gemini 1.5 Pro: which is better?
DeepSeek R1 and Google Gemini 1.5 Pro are closely matched ai language models devices with nearly identical overall scores (7.1 vs 7.0). The best choice depends on which specific features matter most to you.
Is DeepSeek R1 better than Google Gemini 1.5 Pro?
Both products score similarly — it depends on your priorities.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek R1 or Google Gemini 1.5 Pro?
Check the latest prices using the buy links above.
Who should buy the DeepSeek R1?
The DeepSeek R1 is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Who should buy the Google Gemini 1.5 Pro?
The Google Gemini 1.5 Pro is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
