DeepSeek R1 clearly outperforms the Anthropic Claude 3 Opus in the ai language models category, particularly in price, scoring 7.1/10 vs 4.4/10. If you want the better overall performer, DeepSeek R1 is the clear pick.
Scores are relative within the ai language modelscategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
Lower cost = better value. Free = open-source self-hosted.
| Metric | 3 Opus | DeepSeek R1 |
|---|---|---|
| Input (Prompt) | $15.00/1M | ✓$0.55/1M |
| Output (Completion) | $75.00/1M | ✓$2.19/1M |
| Open Source | Proprietary | ✓ Free |
Context Window (tokens)
| Metric | 3 Opus | DeepSeek R1 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Output | 4,096 tok | ✓32,768 tok |
| Speed | ✓35 tok/s | 25 tok/s |
| Time to First Token | ✓1.2s | 3.0s |
| Languages | ✓50+ | 20+ |
Higher is better. Industry-standard AI evaluation benchmarks.
3 Opus
DeepSeek R1
3 Opus
DeepSeek R1
3 Opus
DeepSeek R1
3 Opus
DeepSeek R1
3 Opus
DeepSeek R1
| Feature | 3 Opus | DeepSeek R1 |
|---|---|---|
| Reasoning / Chain-of-Thought | ✕ | ✓ |
| Vision (Image Input) | ✓ | ✕ |
| Audio Input | ✕ | ✕ |
| Video Input | ✕ | ✕ |
| Image/Audio Output | ✕ | ✕ |
| Function Calling / Tools | ✓ | ✕ |
| JSON Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Real-time Web Access | ✕ | ✕ |
| Fine-tuning Support | ✕ | ✓ |
| Batch API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Streaming | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open Source | ✕ | ✓ |
| Field | 3 Opus | DeepSeek R1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | DeepSeek |
| Parameters | — | 671B (37B active) |
| Knowledge Cutoff | 2023-08 | 2024-07 |
| License | Commercial | MIT |
| Best For | complex analysisresearchlong context | reasoningmathscienceopen sourcecost efficiency |
Buy Anthropic Claude 3 Opus if…
The Anthropic Claude 3 Opus is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Buy DeepSeek R1 if…
Buy the DeepSeek R1 if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Who do you think wins this matchup?
DeepSeek R1 clearly outperforms the Anthropic Claude 3 Opus in the ai language models category, particularly in price, scoring 7.1/10 vs 4.4/10. If you want the better overall performer, DeepSeek R1 is the clear pick.
No, DeepSeek R1 scores higher (9.2 vs 8.8).
Check the latest prices using the buy links above.
The Anthropic Claude 3 Opus is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Buy the DeepSeek R1 if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.