Skullcandy Crusher Evo vs Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H9
Prices may vary · We may earn a commission on purchases. Learn more
AI Matrix
Powered by Claude AIBang & Olufsen Beoplay H9 edges out the Skullcandy Crusher Evo in the headphones category, especially in performance, scoring 57 vs 44. If you want the better overall headphones, Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H9 is the recommended choice.
4 Reasons Why Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H9 Is Better
- 1.Lighter: 290g vs 300g
- 2.Better performance score: 100 vs 35
- 3.Higher design rating: 100 vs 35
- 4.Higher overall score: 57 vs 44
What are you giving up?
Picking Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H9 over Skullcandy Crusher Evo means trading these off.
You give up
- −$300 cheaper ($199 vs $499)
- −Longer battery life: 40h vs 25h
You gain
- +10g lighter (290g vs 300g)
Comparaison des spécifications
Skullcandy Crusher EvoBang & Olufsen Beoplay H9
Détail des scores
Skullcandy Crusher EvoBang & Olufsen Beoplay H9
35
Codec Quality25% weight
100Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H9 Gagnant
70
Price20% weight
18Skullcandy Crusher Evo Gagnant
39
Battery Life20% weight
23Skullcandy Crusher Evo Gagnant
35
Noise Cancellation15% weight
100Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H9 Gagnant
37
Driver Size10% weight
37Égalité
50
Water Resistance10% weight
50Égalité
Scores are relative within the headphonescategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.
Skullcandy Crusher Evo
✓ Pros
- ●Longer battery life: 40h vs 25h
- ●Lower price: $199 vs $499
- ●Better battery score
✗ Cons
- ●Lower performance score
Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H9
Gagnant✓ Pros
- ●Lighter build: 290g vs 300g
- ●Higher performance score
- ●Better design score
✗ Cons
- ●Shorter battery life: 25h vs 40h
- ●Higher price: $499 vs $199
Comparaison des spécifications
| Spec | Skullcandy Crusher Evo | Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H9W |
|---|---|---|
| Driver Size | 40mm | 40mm |
| ANC | false | true |
| Transparency Mode | false | true |
| Voice Assistant | — | Google, Alexa |
| Battery Life | 40hrs✓ | 25hrs |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| Codecs | AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC, aptX |
| Multipoint | true | true |
| Foldable | true | true |
| Weight | 300g | 290g✓ |
| Colors | Black, Grey | Black, Brown |
| Price | 199$✓ | 499$ |
Qui devrait acheter
Buy Skullcandy Crusher Evo if…
Choose the Skullcandy Crusher Evo if budget is your top priority — it offers competitive specs at a lower price point.
Buy Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H9 if…
Buy the Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H9 if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Skullcandy Crusher Evo vs Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H9 — FAQ
Skullcandy Crusher Evo vs Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H9: which is better?
Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H9 edges out the Skullcandy Crusher Evo in the headphones category, especially in performance, scoring 57 vs 44. If you want the better overall headphones, Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H9 is the recommended choice.
Is Skullcandy Crusher Evo better than Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H9?
No, Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H9 scores higher (77 vs 53).
Which is cheaper, Skullcandy Crusher Evo or Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H9?
Skullcandy Crusher Evo is cheaper at $199 vs $499 for the Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H9.
Who should buy the Skullcandy Crusher Evo?
Choose the Skullcandy Crusher Evo if budget is your top priority — it offers competitive specs at a lower price point.
Who should buy the Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H9?
Buy the Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H9 if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Which lasts longer, Skullcandy Crusher Evo or Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H9?
Skullcandy Crusher Evo lasts longer with 40 hours vs 25 hours for the other.
Which is lighter, Skullcandy Crusher Evo or Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H9?
Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H9 is lighter at 290g vs 300g.
Comparaisons connexes
Full Skullcandy Crusher Evo review →Full Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H9 review →All Skullcandy Headphones →All Bang & Olufsen Headphones →
Reviewed by VersusMatrix Editorial Team
Last updated: April 25, 2026
Methodology: AI-powered analysis of technical specifications from manufacturer data. Scores are calculated by comparing products across multiple dimensions and normalized relative to the full category database. Our editorial process is independent and not influenced by affiliate partnerships.