Looking for an honest Acer Swift Go 14" Ultra 7 155H vs Samsung Galaxy Book 4 15.6" NP754XGK-LS1US comparison in 2026? We scored both laptops on the same six-dimension framework — performance, battery, display, camera, design and value — using identical methodology, so the numbers below are directly comparable. In our overall scoring the Acer Swift Go 14" Ultra 7 155H comes out ahead 43/100 to 33/100 — a 10-point gap. The widest gap is in display, where the Acer Swift Go 14" Ultra 7 155H pulls noticeably ahead. On price the Acer Swift Go 14" Ultra 7 155H undercuts the Samsung Galaxy Book 4 15.6" NP754XGK-LS1US by 41% ($371.99 vs $523.99), which materially changes the value calculus for budget-conscious buyers.
Prices may vary · We may earn a commission on purchases. Learn more
Acer Swift Go 14" Ultra 7 155H edges out the Samsung Galaxy Book 4 15.6" NP754XGK-LS1US in the laptops category, especially in display quality (120Hz vs 60Hz), scoring 43 vs 33. If you want the better overall laptops, Acer Swift Go 14" Ultra 7 155H is the recommended choice.
Picking Acer Swift Go 14" Ultra 7 155H over Samsung Galaxy Book 4 15.6" NP754XGK-LS1US means trading these off.
Acer
$372
Scores are relative within the laptopscategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
| Spec | Acer Swift Go 14" Ultra 7 155HW | Samsung Galaxy Book 4 15.6" NP754XGK-LS1US |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Intel Core Ultra 7 | Intel Core i7 |
| GPU | Intel Arc Graphics | Intel Iris Xe |
| Display | 14" | 15.6"✓ |
| Display Type | OLED | IPS |
| Resolution | 2880x1800 | 1920 x 1080 pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz✓ | 60Hz |
| Brightness | — | 300nits |
| RAM | 16GB | 16GB |
| RAM Type | — | DDR4 |
| Storage | 512GB | 512GB |
| Storage Type | — | PCIe NVMe SSD |
| Battery | — | 54Wh |
| Battery Life | 12hrs | 12hrs |
| Charging | 65W | 65W |
| Ports | — | 2x USB-A, 1x USB-C, HDMI, headphone jack |
| USB-C | — | 1 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 1.4 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| Webcam | 1080p | 720p |
| Keyboard | — | Chiclet keyboard |
| Fingerprint | true | true |
| OS | Windows 11 Home | Windows 11 Home |
| Dimensions | 313x220x16 mm | 356.8 x 227.1 x 19.9 mm |
| Weight | 1200g✓ | 1500g |
| Colors | Silver | Silver |
| Price | 371.99$✓ | 523.99$ |
Buy Acer Swift Go 14" Ultra 7 155H if…
Buy the Acer Swift Go 14" Ultra 7 155H if you want the best overall value in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Buy Samsung Galaxy Book 4 15.6" NP754XGK-LS1US if…
The Samsung Galaxy Book 4 15.6" NP754XGK-LS1US is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Acer Swift Go 14" Ultra 7 155H edges out the Samsung Galaxy Book 4 15.6" NP754XGK-LS1US in the laptops category, especially in display quality (120Hz vs 60Hz), scoring 43 vs 33. If you want the better overall laptops, Acer Swift Go 14" Ultra 7 155H is the recommended choice.
Yes, Acer Swift Go 14" Ultra 7 155H scores higher overall (68 vs 65).
Acer Swift Go 14" Ultra 7 155H is cheaper at $371.99 vs $523.99 for the Samsung Galaxy Book 4 15.6" NP754XGK-LS1US.
Buy the Acer Swift Go 14" Ultra 7 155H if you want the best overall value in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
The Samsung Galaxy Book 4 15.6" NP754XGK-LS1US is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Both have the same 6000mAh battery.
Both offer 12 hours of battery life.
Samsung Galaxy Book 4 15.6" NP754XGK-LS1US has the larger display (15.6" vs 14").
Acer Swift Go 14" Ultra 7 155H is lighter at 1200g vs 1500g.
Reviewed by VersusMatrix Editorial Team
Last updated: May 31, 2026
Methodology: AI-powered analysis of technical specifications from manufacturer data. Scores are calculated by comparing products across multiple dimensions and normalized relative to the full category database. Our editorial process is independent and not influenced by affiliate partnerships.
