Looking for an honest Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra comparison in 2026? We scored both smartphones on the same six-dimension framework — performance, battery, display, camera, design and value — using identical methodology, so the numbers below are directly comparable. In our overall scoring the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge comes out ahead 78/100 to 52/100 — a 26-point gap. The widest gap is in performance, where the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge pulls noticeably ahead. On price the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge undercuts the Xiaomi 15 Ultra by 114% ($512.99 vs $1,099), which materially changes the value calculus for budget-conscious buyers.

Prices may vary · We may earn a commission on purchases. Learn more
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge clearly outperforms the Xiaomi 15 Ultra in the smartphones category, especially in performance (benchmark 220 vs 50), scoring 78 vs 52. If you want the better overall smartphones, Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge is the recommended choice.
Picking Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge over Xiaomi 15 Ultra means trading these off.
Samsung
$513
Scores are relative within the smartphonescategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 EdgeW | Xiaomi 15 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 6.7" | 6.73"✓ |
| Display Type | Dynamic AMOLED 2X | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | — | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz |
| Brightness | — | 3200nits |
| HDR | — | HDR10+, Dolby Vision |
| Protection | — | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| CPU | — | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2) |
| GPU | — | Adreno 830 |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB |
| Storage | 256GB | 512GB✓ |
| Storage Options | — | 512GB |
| Main Camera | 200MP✓ | 50MP |
| Aperture | — | f/1.63 |
| OIS | — | Yes |
| Zoom | — | 4.3x optical, 10x optical periscope |
| Video | — | 8K@30fps, 4K@120fps |
| Front Camera | 12MP | 32MP✓ |
| Battery | 3900mAh | 6000mAh✓ |
| Charging | 45W | 90W✓ |
| Wireless Charging | — | 80W |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15, HyperOS 2 |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) |
| Bluetooth | — | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| NFC | — | Yes |
| USB | — | USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 |
| Water Resistance | — | IP68 |
| Biometrics | — | Under-display fingerprint, Face unlock |
| Dimensions | — | 161.4 x 75.3 x 9.5 mm |
| Weight | 163g✓ | 229g |
| Colors | — | Black, White |
| Price | 512.99$ | 1099$ |
Buy Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge if…
Buy the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Buy Xiaomi 15 Ultra if…
The Xiaomi 15 Ultra is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge clearly outperforms the Xiaomi 15 Ultra in the smartphones category, especially in performance (benchmark 220 vs 50), scoring 78 vs 52. If you want the better overall smartphones, Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge is the recommended choice.
Yes, Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge scores higher overall (78 vs 52).
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge is cheaper at $512.99 vs $1099 for the Xiaomi 15 Ultra.
Buy the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
The Xiaomi 15 Ultra is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Xiaomi 15 Ultra has a larger battery (6,000mAh vs 3,900mAh for the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge), which generally means longer use between charges.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge has a higher-resolution main camera (200MP vs 50MP). Note that megapixels are one factor — sensor quality and processing also matter.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge is lighter at 163g vs 229g.
Reviewed by VersusMatrix Editorial Team
Last updated: May 11, 2026
Methodology: AI-powered analysis of technical specifications from manufacturer data. Scores are calculated by comparing products across multiple dimensions and normalized relative to the full category database. Our editorial process is independent and not influenced by affiliate partnerships.