Looking for an honest Samsung 970 EVO M.2 Internal NVMe V-NAND SSD vs Seagate FireCuda comparison in 2026? We scored both ssd storage on the same six-dimension framework — performance, battery, display, camera, design and value — using identical methodology, so the numbers below are directly comparable. In our overall scoring the Seagate FireCuda comes out ahead 41/100 to 62/100 — a 21-point gap. The widest gap is in design and build, where the Seagate FireCuda pulls noticeably ahead. On price the Samsung 970 EVO M.2 Internal NVMe V-NAND SSD undercuts the Seagate FireCuda by 118% ($105 vs $229), which materially changes the value calculus for budget-conscious buyers.
Prices may vary · We may earn a commission on purchases. Learn more
Seagate FireCuda clearly outperforms the Samsung 970 EVO M.2 Internal NVMe V-NAND SSD in the ssd storage category, especially in design, scoring 62 vs 41. If you want the better overall ssd storage, Seagate FireCuda is the recommended choice.
Picking Seagate FireCuda over Samsung 970 EVO M.2 Internal NVMe V-NAND SSD means trading these off.
Specs are roughly matched — winner decided on overall scoring, not a specific spec advantage.
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
| Spec | Samsung 970 EVO M.2 Internal NVMe V-NAND SSD | Seagate FireCudaW |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 105$✓ | 229$ |
| Storage | 2000GB | — |
| Weight | 8g | — |
| Dimensions | 80 x 22 x 2.38 mm | — |
Buy Samsung 970 EVO M.2 Internal NVMe V-NAND SSD if…
Choose the Samsung 970 EVO M.2 Internal NVMe V-NAND SSD if budget is your top priority — it offers competitive specs at a lower price point.
Buy Seagate FireCuda if…
Buy the Seagate FireCuda if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Seagate FireCuda clearly outperforms the Samsung 970 EVO M.2 Internal NVMe V-NAND SSD in the ssd storage category, especially in design, scoring 62 vs 41. If you want the better overall ssd storage, Seagate FireCuda is the recommended choice.
No, Seagate FireCuda scores higher (62 vs 41).
Samsung 970 EVO M.2 Internal NVMe V-NAND SSD is cheaper at $105 vs $229 for the Seagate FireCuda.
Choose the Samsung 970 EVO M.2 Internal NVMe V-NAND SSD if budget is your top priority — it offers competitive specs at a lower price point.
Buy the Seagate FireCuda if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Reviewed by VersusMatrix Editorial Team
Last updated: May 11, 2026
Methodology: AI-powered analysis of technical specifications from manufacturer data. Scores are calculated by comparing products across multiple dimensions and normalized relative to the full category database. Our editorial process is independent and not influenced by affiliate partnerships.
Scores are relative within the ssd storagecategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.