Looking for an honest Philips Ambilight 65OLED803 vs Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED comparison in 2026? We scored both televisions on the same six-dimension framework — performance, battery, display, camera, design and value — using identical methodology, so the numbers below are directly comparable. In our overall scoring the Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED comes out ahead 46/100 to 86/100 — a 40-point gap. The widest gap is in design and build, where the Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED pulls noticeably ahead. On price the Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED undercuts the Philips Ambilight 65OLED803 by 620% ($250 vs $1,799), which materially changes the value calculus for budget-conscious buyers.
Prices may vary · We may earn a commission on purchases. Learn more
Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED clearly outperforms the Philips Ambilight 65OLED803 in the televisions category, especially in design, scoring 86 vs 46. If you want the better overall televisions, Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED is the recommended choice.
Picking Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED over Philips Ambilight 65OLED803 means trading these off.
Nada significativo — las especificaciones son prácticamente iguales
Philips
$1799
Scores are relative within the televisionscategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.
✗ Cons
✓ Pros
| Spec | Philips Ambilight 65OLED803 | Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLEDW |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 65" | 85"✓ |
| Panel Type | OLED | Neo QLED |
| Resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 3840 x 2160 pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz |
| HDR | — | HDR10+ |
| Weight | — | 4500g |
| Price | 1799$ | 250$✓ |
Buy Philips Ambilight 65OLED803 if…
The Philips Ambilight 65OLED803 is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Buy Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED if…
Buy the Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED clearly outperforms the Philips Ambilight 65OLED803 in the televisions category, especially in design, scoring 86 vs 46. If you want the better overall televisions, Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED is the recommended choice.
No, Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED scores higher (86 vs 46).
Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED is cheaper at $250 vs $1799 for the Philips Ambilight 65OLED803.
The Philips Ambilight 65OLED803 is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Buy the Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED has the larger display (85" vs 65").
Reviewed by VersusMatrix Editorial Team
Last updated: June 1, 2026
Methodology: AI-powered analysis of technical specifications from manufacturer data. Scores are calculated by comparing products across multiple dimensions and normalized relative to the full category database. Our editorial process is independent and not influenced by affiliate partnerships.
