Looking for an honest Panasonic Z95a Oled vs Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED comparison in 2026? We scored both televisions on the same six-dimension framework — performance, battery, display, camera, design and value — using identical methodology, so the numbers below are directly comparable. In our overall scoring the Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED comes out ahead 41/100 to 86/100 — a 45-point gap. The widest gap is in design and build, where the Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED pulls noticeably ahead. On price the Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED undercuts the Panasonic Z95a Oled by 900% ($250 vs $2,499), which materially changes the value calculus for budget-conscious buyers.
Prices may vary · We may earn a commission on purchases. Learn more
Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED clearly outperforms the Panasonic Z95a Oled in the televisions category, especially in value ($250 vs $2499), scoring 86 vs 41. If you want the better overall televisions, Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED is the recommended choice.
Picking Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED over Panasonic Z95a Oled means trading these off.
Nada significativo — las especificaciones son prácticamente iguales
Panasonic
$2499
Scores are relative within the televisionscategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.
✗ Cons
✓ Pros
| Spec | Panasonic Z95a Oled | Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLEDW |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 65" | 85"✓ |
| Panel Type | OLED | Neo QLED |
| Resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 3840 x 2160 pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz |
| HDR | — | HDR10+ |
| Weight | — | 4500g |
| Price | 2499$ | 250$✓ |
Buy Panasonic Z95a Oled if…
The Panasonic Z95a Oled is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Buy Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED if…
Buy the Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED clearly outperforms the Panasonic Z95a Oled in the televisions category, especially in value ($250 vs $2499), scoring 86 vs 41. If you want the better overall televisions, Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED is the recommended choice.
No, Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED scores higher (86 vs 41).
Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED is cheaper at $250 vs $2499 for the Panasonic Z95a Oled.
The Panasonic Z95a Oled is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Buy the Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Samsung QN85QN85BAF 85" 4K UHD Neo QLED has the larger display (85" vs 65").
Reviewed by VersusMatrix Editorial Team
Last updated: June 1, 2026
Methodology: AI-powered analysis of technical specifications from manufacturer data. Scores are calculated by comparing products across multiple dimensions and normalized relative to the full category database. Our editorial process is independent and not influenced by affiliate partnerships.
