Looking for an honest Motorola Moto G75 5G vs Samsung Galaxy S24 Fe Fully 6.7in comparison in 2026? We scored both smartphones on the same six-dimension framework — performance, battery, display, camera, design and value — using identical methodology, so the numbers below are directly comparable. In our overall scoring the Samsung Galaxy S24 Fe Fully 6.7in comes out ahead 49/100 to 75/100 — a 26-point gap. The widest gap is in performance, where the Samsung Galaxy S24 Fe Fully 6.7in pulls noticeably ahead. On price the Motorola Moto G75 5G undercuts the Samsung Galaxy S24 Fe Fully 6.7in by 21% ($219 vs $265), which materially changes the value calculus for budget-conscious buyers.

Motorola
Prices may vary · We may earn a commission on purchases. Learn more
Samsung Galaxy S24 Fe Fully 6.7in clearly outperforms the Motorola Moto G75 5G in the smartphones category, especially in performance (benchmark 210 vs 100), scoring 75 vs 49. If you want the better overall smartphones, Samsung Galaxy S24 Fe Fully 6.7in is the recommended choice.
Picking Samsung Galaxy S24 Fe Fully 6.7in over Motorola Moto G75 5G means trading these off.
$219
Scores are relative within the smartphonescategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
| Spec | Motorola Moto G75 5G | Samsung Galaxy S24 Fe Fully 6.7inW |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 6.67"✓ | 6.2" |
| Display Type | IPS LCD | — |
| Resolution | 2400 x 1080 pixels | — |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz |
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 930 | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| CPU | Octa-core 2.2 GHz | — |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC2 | — |
| RAM | 12GB✓ | 8GB |
| Storage | 512GB✓ | 128GB |
| Storage Options | 128GB, 256GB | — |
| Main Camera | 5MP | 50MP✓ |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | — |
| Front Camera | 16MP✓ | 12MP |
| Battery | 5000mAh✓ | 4000mAh |
| Charging | 30W✓ | 25W |
| OS | A | Android 14 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) | — |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.1 | — |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | — |
| Water Resistance | IP53 | IP68 |
| Dimensions | 162.8 x 75.9 x 8.1 mm | — |
| Weight | 190g | 167g✓ |
| Colors | Black, Blue, Gray | — |
| Price | 219$✓ | 265$ |
Buy Motorola Moto G75 5G if…
The Motorola Moto G75 5G is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Buy Samsung Galaxy S24 Fe Fully 6.7in if…
Buy the Samsung Galaxy S24 Fe Fully 6.7in if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Samsung Galaxy S24 Fe Fully 6.7in clearly outperforms the Motorola Moto G75 5G in the smartphones category, especially in performance (benchmark 210 vs 100), scoring 75 vs 49. If you want the better overall smartphones, Samsung Galaxy S24 Fe Fully 6.7in is the recommended choice.
No, Samsung Galaxy S24 Fe Fully 6.7in scores higher (75 vs 49).
Motorola Moto G75 5G is cheaper at $219 vs $265 for the Samsung Galaxy S24 Fe Fully 6.7in.
The Motorola Moto G75 5G is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Buy the Samsung Galaxy S24 Fe Fully 6.7in if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Motorola Moto G75 5G has a larger battery (5,000mAh vs 4,000mAh for the Samsung Galaxy S24 Fe Fully 6.7in), which generally means longer use between charges.
Motorola Moto G75 5G has the larger display (6.67" vs 6.2").
Samsung Galaxy S24 Fe Fully 6.7in has a higher-resolution main camera (50MP vs 5MP). Note that megapixels are one factor — sensor quality and processing also matter.
Samsung Galaxy S24 Fe Fully 6.7in is lighter at 167g vs 190g.
Motorola Moto G75 5G has more RAM (12GB vs 8GB), which helps with multitasking.
Reviewed by VersusMatrix Editorial Team
Last updated: May 10, 2026
Methodology: AI-powered analysis of technical specifications from manufacturer data. Scores are calculated by comparing products across multiple dimensions and normalized relative to the full category database. Our editorial process is independent and not influenced by affiliate partnerships.