Microsoft Phi-4 vs Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B
AI Matrix
Powered by Claude AIMicrosoft Phi-4 and Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B are closely matched ai language models devices with nearly identical overall scores (6.0 vs 5.9). The best choice depends on which specific features matter most to you.
Comparación de especificaciones
Microsoft Phi-4Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B
Desglose de puntuación
Microsoft Phi-4Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B
10.0
Cost Efficiency20% weight
9.8Empate
7.1
Benchmark (MMLU)30% weight
7.4Empate
2.3
Arena ELO20% weight
3.3Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B Ganador
0.1
Context Window10% weight
1.2Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B Ganador
8.2
Speed (tok/s)10% weight
2.5Microsoft Phi-4 Ganador
5.6
Coding (HumanEval)10% weight
6.6Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B Ganador
Scores are relative within the ai language modelscategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.
Microsoft Phi-4
✓ Pros
- ●Better display quality
✗ Cons
- ●Shorter battery life
- ●Lower camera score
Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B
✓ Pros
- ●Superior battery life
- ●Higher camera score
- ●Better build and design
✗ Cons
- ●Lower display score
💰 Token Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Lower cost = better value. Free = open-source self-hosted.
| Metric | Microsoft Phi-4 | 2.5 72B |
|---|---|---|
| Input (Prompt) | ✓$0.07/1M | $0.40/1M |
| Output (Completion) | ✓$0.26/1M | $1.20/1M |
| Open Source | ✓ Free | ✓ Free |
⚡ Context Window & Speed
Context Window (tokens)
Microsoft Phi-416K
2.5 72B128K
| Metric | Microsoft Phi-4 | 2.5 72B |
|---|---|---|
| Max Output | 4,096 tok | ✓8,192 tok |
| Speed | ✓250 tok/s | 90 tok/s |
| Time to First Token | ✓150ms | 500ms |
| Languages | 15+ | ✓29+ |
📊 Benchmark Scores
Higher is better. Industry-standard AI evaluation benchmarks.
Microsoft Phi-4
2.5 72B
MMLU (Knowledge)
84.8|86.0
Microsoft Phi-4
2.5 72B
HumanEval (Coding)
82.6|86.6
Microsoft Phi-4
2.5 72B
MATH (Mathematics)
80.4|73.8
Microsoft Phi-4
2.5 72B
GPQA (Expert Q&A)
56.1|49.5
Microsoft Phi-4
2.5 72B
Chatbot Arena ELO
1213.0|1239.0
Microsoft Phi-4
2.5 72B
🔧 Capabilities
| Feature | Microsoft Phi-4 | 2.5 72B |
|---|---|---|
| Reasoning / Chain-of-Thought | ✕ | ✕ |
| Vision (Image Input) | ✕ | ✕ |
| Audio Input | ✕ | ✕ |
| Video Input | ✕ | ✕ |
| Image/Audio Output | ✕ | ✕ |
| Function Calling / Tools | ✕ | ✓ |
| JSON Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Real-time Web Access | ✕ | ✕ |
| Fine-tuning Support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Batch API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Streaming | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open Source | ✓ | ✓ |
ℹ️ Model Details
| Field | Microsoft Phi-4 | 2.5 72B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba |
| Parameters | 14B | 72B |
| Knowledge Cutoff | 2024-06 | 2024-09 |
| License | MIT | Qwen Community |
| Best For | edge deploymentSTEMcost efficiencymathsmall footprint | multilingualcodingopen sourceChinese language |
Quién debería comprar
Buy Microsoft Phi-4 if…
The Microsoft Phi-4 is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Buy Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B if…
The Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Microsoft Phi-4 vs Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B — FAQ
Microsoft Phi-4 vs Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B: which is better?
Microsoft Phi-4 and Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B are closely matched ai language models devices with nearly identical overall scores (6.0 vs 5.9). The best choice depends on which specific features matter most to you.
Is Microsoft Phi-4 better than Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B?
Both products score similarly — it depends on your priorities.
Which is cheaper, Microsoft Phi-4 or Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B?
Check the latest prices using the buy links above.
Who should buy the Microsoft Phi-4?
The Microsoft Phi-4 is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Who should buy the Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B?
The Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
