Meta Llama 3.1 405B edges out the Meta Llama 3.1 70B in the ai language models category, particularly in design, scoring 6.2/10 vs 5.3/10. If you want the better overall performer, Meta Llama 3.1 405B is the clear pick.
Scores are relative within the ai language modelscategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
Lower cost = better value. Free = open-source self-hosted.
| Metric | 3.1 405B | 3.1 70B |
|---|---|---|
| Input (Prompt) | Free/1M | Free/1M |
| Output (Completion) | Free/1M | Free/1M |
| Open Source | ✓ Free | ✓ Free |
Context Window (tokens)
| Metric | 3.1 405B | 3.1 70B |
|---|---|---|
| Max Output | 4,096 tok | 4,096 tok |
| Speed | 30 tok/s | ✓90 tok/s |
| Time to First Token | 1.5s | ✓500ms |
| Languages | 8+ | 8+ |
Higher is better. Industry-standard AI evaluation benchmarks.
3.1 405B
3.1 70B
3.1 405B
3.1 70B
3.1 405B
3.1 70B
3.1 405B
3.1 70B
3.1 405B
3.1 70B
| Feature | 3.1 405B | 3.1 70B |
|---|---|---|
| Reasoning / Chain-of-Thought | ✕ | ✕ |
| Vision (Image Input) | ✕ | ✕ |
| Audio Input | ✕ | ✕ |
| Video Input | ✕ | ✕ |
| Image/Audio Output | ✕ | ✕ |
| Function Calling / Tools | ✓ | ✓ |
| JSON Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Real-time Web Access | ✕ | ✕ |
| Fine-tuning Support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Batch API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Streaming | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open Source | ✓ | ✓ |
| Field | 3.1 405B | 3.1 70B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Meta |
| Parameters | 405B | 70B |
| Knowledge Cutoff | 2023-12 | 2023-12 |
| License | Llama 3.1 Community | Llama 3.1 Community |
| Best For | open sourceself hostingfine tuningenterprise privacy | open sourceself hostingfine tuningcost efficiency |
Buy Meta Llama 3.1 405B if…
Buy the Meta Llama 3.1 405B if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Buy Meta Llama 3.1 70B if…
The Meta Llama 3.1 70B is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Who do you think wins this matchup?
Meta Llama 3.1 405B edges out the Meta Llama 3.1 70B in the ai language models category, particularly in design, scoring 6.2/10 vs 5.3/10. If you want the better overall performer, Meta Llama 3.1 405B is the clear pick.
Yes, Meta Llama 3.1 405B scores higher overall (8.7 vs 8.1).
Check the latest prices using the buy links above.
Buy the Meta Llama 3.1 405B if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
The Meta Llama 3.1 70B is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.