Google Gemini 1.5 Pro vs OpenAI o3-mini
AI Matrix
Powered by Claude AIGoogle Gemini 1.5 Pro narrowly beats the OpenAI o3-mini in the ai language models category, particularly in battery, scoring 7.0/10 vs 6.6/10. If you want the better overall performer, Google Gemini 1.5 Pro is the clear pick.
3 Reasons Why Google Gemini 1.5 Pro Is Better
- 1.Better display rating: 3.2 vs 2.1
- 2.Better battery score: 10.0 vs 1.9
- 3.Higher overall score: 7.0/10 vs 6.6/10
Comparación de especificaciones
Google Gemini 1.5 ProOpenAI o3-mini
Desglose de puntuación
Google Gemini 1.5 ProOpenAI o3-mini
9.4
Cost Efficiency20% weight
9.4Empate
7.4
Benchmark (MMLU)30% weight
7.7Empate
5.1
Arena ELO20% weight
5.7OpenAI o3-mini Ganador
10.0
Context Window10% weight
1.9Google Gemini 1.5 Pro Ganador
3.2
Speed (tok/s)10% weight
2.1Google Gemini 1.5 Pro Ganador
6.0
Coding (HumanEval)10% weight
8.2OpenAI o3-mini Ganador
Scores are relative within the ai language modelscategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.
Google Gemini 1.5 Pro
Ganador✓ Pros
- ●Better display quality
- ●Superior battery life
✗ Cons
- ●Lower camera score
OpenAI o3-mini
✓ Pros
- ●Higher camera score
- ●Better build and design
✗ Cons
- ●Shorter battery life
- ●Lower display score
💰 Token Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Lower cost = better value. Free = open-source self-hosted.
| Metric | 1.5 Pro | OpenAI o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Input (Prompt) | $1.25/1M | ✓$1.10/1M |
| Output (Completion) | $5.00/1M | ✓$4.40/1M |
| Open Source | Proprietary | Proprietary |
⚡ Context Window & Speed
Context Window (tokens)
1.5 Pro1M
OpenAI o3-mini200K
| Metric | 1.5 Pro | OpenAI o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Max Output | 8,192 tok | ✓100,000 tok |
| Speed | ✓110 tok/s | 80 tok/s |
| Time to First Token | ✓700ms | 2.0s |
| Languages | 40+ | ✓50+ |
📊 Benchmark Scores
Higher is better. Industry-standard AI evaluation benchmarks.
1.5 Pro
OpenAI o3-mini
MMLU (Knowledge)
85.9|86.9
1.5 Pro
OpenAI o3-mini
HumanEval (Coding)
84.1|92.9
1.5 Pro
OpenAI o3-mini
MATH (Mathematics)
67.7|87.3
1.5 Pro
OpenAI o3-mini
GPQA (Expert Q&A)
46.2|76.7
1.5 Pro
OpenAI o3-mini
Chatbot Arena ELO
1287.0|1305.0
1.5 Pro
OpenAI o3-mini
🔧 Capabilities
| Feature | 1.5 Pro | OpenAI o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Reasoning / Chain-of-Thought | ✕ | ✓ |
| Vision (Image Input) | ✓ | ✕ |
| Audio Input | ✓ | ✕ |
| Video Input | ✓ | ✕ |
| Image/Audio Output | ✕ | ✕ |
| Function Calling / Tools | ✓ | ✓ |
| JSON Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Real-time Web Access | ✕ | ✕ |
| Fine-tuning Support | ✕ | ✕ |
| Batch API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Streaming | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open Source | ✕ | ✕ |
ℹ️ Model Details
| Field | 1.5 Pro | OpenAI o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Knowledge Cutoff | 2023-11 | 2023-10 |
| Best For | long contextdocument analysisvideogeneral | reasoningcodingmathcost efficiency |
Quién debería comprar
Buy Google Gemini 1.5 Pro if…
Buy the Google Gemini 1.5 Pro if you want the best overall value in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Buy OpenAI o3-mini if…
The OpenAI o3-mini is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Google Gemini 1.5 Pro vs OpenAI o3-mini — FAQ
Google Gemini 1.5 Pro vs OpenAI o3-mini: which is better?
Google Gemini 1.5 Pro narrowly beats the OpenAI o3-mini in the ai language models category, particularly in battery, scoring 7.0/10 vs 6.6/10. If you want the better overall performer, Google Gemini 1.5 Pro is the clear pick.
Is Google Gemini 1.5 Pro better than OpenAI o3-mini?
Yes, Google Gemini 1.5 Pro scores higher overall (8.9 vs 8.9).
Which is cheaper, Google Gemini 1.5 Pro or OpenAI o3-mini?
Check the latest prices using the buy links above.
Who should buy the Google Gemini 1.5 Pro?
Buy the Google Gemini 1.5 Pro if you want the best overall value in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Who should buy the OpenAI o3-mini?
The OpenAI o3-mini is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
