DeepSeek R1 vs Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B
AI Matrix
Powered by Claude AIDeepSeek R1 edges out the Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B in the ai language models category, particularly in design, scoring 7.1/10 vs 5.9/10. If you want the better overall performer, DeepSeek R1 is the clear pick.
4 Reasons Why DeepSeek R1 Is Better
- 1.Better performance score: 8.8 vs 7.4
- 2.Higher camera score: 8.1 vs 6.6
- 3.Higher design rating: 7.7 vs 3.3
- 4.Higher overall score: 7.1/10 vs 5.9/10
Comparación de especificaciones
DeepSeek R1Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B
Desglose de puntuación
DeepSeek R1Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B
9.7
Cost Efficiency20% weight
9.8Empate
8.8
Benchmark (MMLU)30% weight
7.4DeepSeek R1 Ganador
7.7
Arena ELO20% weight
3.3DeepSeek R1 Ganador
1.2
Context Window10% weight
1.2Empate
0.2
Speed (tok/s)10% weight
2.5Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B Ganador
8.1
Coding (HumanEval)10% weight
6.6DeepSeek R1 Ganador
Scores are relative within the ai language modelscategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.
DeepSeek R1
Ganador✓ Pros
- ●Strong performance score
- ●Higher camera score
- ●Better build and design
✗ Cons
- ●Lower display score
Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B
✓ Pros
- ●Better display quality
✗ Cons
- ●Lower camera score
- ●Lower performance score
💰 Token Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Lower cost = better value. Free = open-source self-hosted.
| Metric | DeepSeek R1 | 2.5 72B |
|---|---|---|
| Input (Prompt) | $0.55/1M | ✓$0.40/1M |
| Output (Completion) | $2.19/1M | ✓$1.20/1M |
| Open Source | ✓ Free | ✓ Free |
⚡ Context Window & Speed
Context Window (tokens)
DeepSeek R1128K
2.5 72B128K
| Metric | DeepSeek R1 | 2.5 72B |
|---|---|---|
| Max Output | ✓32,768 tok | 8,192 tok |
| Speed | 25 tok/s | ✓90 tok/s |
| Time to First Token | 3.0s | ✓500ms |
| Languages | 20+ | ✓29+ |
📊 Benchmark Scores
Higher is better. Industry-standard AI evaluation benchmarks.
DeepSeek R1
2.5 72B
MMLU (Knowledge)
90.8|86.0
DeepSeek R1
2.5 72B
HumanEval (Coding)
92.6|86.6
DeepSeek R1
2.5 72B
MATH (Mathematics)
97.3|73.8
DeepSeek R1
2.5 72B
GPQA (Expert Q&A)
71.5|49.5
DeepSeek R1
2.5 72B
Chatbot Arena ELO
1358.0|1239.0
DeepSeek R1
2.5 72B
🔧 Capabilities
| Feature | DeepSeek R1 | 2.5 72B |
|---|---|---|
| Reasoning / Chain-of-Thought | ✓ | ✕ |
| Vision (Image Input) | ✕ | ✕ |
| Audio Input | ✕ | ✕ |
| Video Input | ✕ | ✕ |
| Image/Audio Output | ✕ | ✕ |
| Function Calling / Tools | ✕ | ✓ |
| JSON Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Real-time Web Access | ✕ | ✕ |
| Fine-tuning Support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Batch API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Streaming | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open Source | ✓ | ✓ |
ℹ️ Model Details
| Field | DeepSeek R1 | 2.5 72B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Alibaba |
| Parameters | 671B (37B active) | 72B |
| Knowledge Cutoff | 2024-07 | 2024-09 |
| License | MIT | Qwen Community |
| Best For | reasoningmathscienceopen sourcecost efficiency | multilingualcodingopen sourceChinese language |
Quién debería comprar
Buy DeepSeek R1 if…
Buy the DeepSeek R1 if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Buy Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B if…
The Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
DeepSeek R1 vs Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B — FAQ
DeepSeek R1 vs Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B: which is better?
DeepSeek R1 edges out the Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B in the ai language models category, particularly in design, scoring 7.1/10 vs 5.9/10. If you want the better overall performer, DeepSeek R1 is the clear pick.
Is DeepSeek R1 better than Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B?
Yes, DeepSeek R1 scores higher overall (9.2 vs 8.4).
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek R1 or Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B?
Check the latest prices using the buy links above.
Who should buy the DeepSeek R1?
Buy the DeepSeek R1 if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Who should buy the Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B?
The Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
