DeepSeek R1 vs OpenAI GPT-4o
AI Matrix
Powered by Claude AIDeepSeek R1 narrowly beats the OpenAI GPT-4o in the ai language models category, particularly in design, scoring 7.1/10 vs 6.7/10. If you want the better overall performer, DeepSeek R1 is the clear pick.
5 Reasons Why DeepSeek R1 Is Better
- 1.Better performance score: 8.8 vs 8.2
- 2.Higher camera score: 8.1 vs 7.6
- 3.Higher design rating: 7.7 vs 6.1
- 4.Better value score: 9.7 vs 8.8
- 5.Higher overall score: 7.1/10 vs 6.7/10
Comparación de especificaciones
DeepSeek R1OpenAI GPT-4o
Desglose de puntuación
DeepSeek R1OpenAI GPT-4o
9.7
Cost Efficiency20% weight
8.8DeepSeek R1 Ganador
8.8
Benchmark (MMLU)30% weight
8.2DeepSeek R1 Ganador
7.7
Arena ELO20% weight
6.1DeepSeek R1 Ganador
1.2
Context Window10% weight
1.2Empate
0.2
Speed (tok/s)10% weight
3.6OpenAI GPT-4o Ganador
8.1
Coding (HumanEval)10% weight
7.6Empate
Scores are relative within the ai language modelscategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.
DeepSeek R1
Ganador✓ Pros
- ●Strong performance score
- ●Higher camera score
- ●Better build and design
✗ Cons
- ●Lower display score
OpenAI GPT-4o
✓ Pros
- ●Better display quality
✗ Cons
- ●Higher price tag
- ●Lower camera score
- ●Lower performance score
💰 Token Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Lower cost = better value. Free = open-source self-hosted.
| Metric | DeepSeek R1 | OpenAI GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| Input (Prompt) | ✓$0.55/1M | $2.50/1M |
| Output (Completion) | ✓$2.19/1M | $10.00/1M |
| Open Source | ✓ Free | Proprietary |
⚡ Context Window & Speed
Context Window (tokens)
DeepSeek R1128K
OpenAI GPT-4o128K
| Metric | DeepSeek R1 | OpenAI GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| Max Output | ✓32,768 tok | 16,384 tok |
| Speed | 25 tok/s | ✓120 tok/s |
| Time to First Token | 3.0s | ✓500ms |
| Languages | 20+ | ✓50+ |
📊 Benchmark Scores
Higher is better. Industry-standard AI evaluation benchmarks.
DeepSeek R1
OpenAI GPT-4o
MMLU (Knowledge)
90.8|88.7
DeepSeek R1
OpenAI GPT-4o
HumanEval (Coding)
92.6|90.2
DeepSeek R1
OpenAI GPT-4o
MATH (Mathematics)
97.3|76.6
DeepSeek R1
OpenAI GPT-4o
GPQA (Expert Q&A)
71.5|53.6
DeepSeek R1
OpenAI GPT-4o
Chatbot Arena ELO
1358.0|1314.0
DeepSeek R1
OpenAI GPT-4o
🔧 Capabilities
| Feature | DeepSeek R1 | OpenAI GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| Reasoning / Chain-of-Thought | ✓ | ✕ |
| Vision (Image Input) | ✕ | ✓ |
| Audio Input | ✕ | ✓ |
| Video Input | ✕ | ✕ |
| Image/Audio Output | ✕ | ✓ |
| Function Calling / Tools | ✕ | ✓ |
| JSON Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Real-time Web Access | ✕ | ✕ |
| Fine-tuning Support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Batch API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Streaming | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open Source | ✓ | ✕ |
ℹ️ Model Details
| Field | DeepSeek R1 | OpenAI GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | OpenAI |
| Parameters | 671B (37B active) | — |
| Knowledge Cutoff | 2024-07 | 2024-04 |
| License | MIT | Commercial |
| Best For | reasoningmathscienceopen sourcecost efficiency | generalcodingvisionmultimodal |
Quién debería comprar
Buy DeepSeek R1 if…
Buy the DeepSeek R1 if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Buy OpenAI GPT-4o if…
The OpenAI GPT-4o is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Community Vote
Who do you think wins this matchup?
DeepSeek R1 vs OpenAI GPT-4o — FAQ
DeepSeek R1 vs OpenAI GPT-4o: which is better?
DeepSeek R1 narrowly beats the OpenAI GPT-4o in the ai language models category, particularly in design, scoring 7.1/10 vs 6.7/10. If you want the better overall performer, DeepSeek R1 is the clear pick.
Is DeepSeek R1 better than OpenAI GPT-4o?
Yes, DeepSeek R1 scores higher overall (9.2 vs 9.2).
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek R1 or OpenAI GPT-4o?
Check the latest prices using the buy links above.
Who should buy the DeepSeek R1?
Buy the DeepSeek R1 if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Who should buy the OpenAI GPT-4o?
The OpenAI GPT-4o is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
