Anthropic Claude 3 Opus vs OpenAI o1
AI Matrix
Powered by Claude AIOpenAI o1 edges out the Anthropic Claude 3 Opus in the ai language models category, particularly in design, scoring 5.8/10 vs 4.4/10. If you want the better overall performer, OpenAI o1 is the clear pick.
4 Reasons Why OpenAI o1 Is Better
- 1.Better performance score: 9.2 vs 7.7
- 2.Higher camera score: 8.1 vs 6.2
- 3.Higher design rating: 7.5 vs 3.6
- 4.Higher overall score: 5.8/10 vs 4.4/10
Comparación de especificaciones
Anthropic Claude 3 OpusOpenAI o1
Desglose de puntuación
Anthropic Claude 3 OpusOpenAI o1
2.5
Cost Efficiency20% weight
2.5Empate
7.7
Benchmark (MMLU)30% weight
9.2OpenAI o1 Ganador
3.6
Arena ELO20% weight
7.5OpenAI o1 Ganador
1.9
Context Window10% weight
1.9Empate
0.5
Speed (tok/s)10% weight
0.7Empate
6.2
Coding (HumanEval)10% weight
8.1OpenAI o1 Ganador
Scores are relative within the ai language modelscategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.
Anthropic Claude 3 Opus
✗ Cons
- ●Lower camera score
- ●Lower performance score
OpenAI o1
Ganador✓ Pros
- ●Strong performance score
- ●Higher camera score
- ●Better build and design
💰 Token Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Lower cost = better value. Free = open-source self-hosted.
| Metric | 3 Opus | OpenAI o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Input (Prompt) | $15.00/1M | $15.00/1M |
| Output (Completion) | $75.00/1M | ✓$60.00/1M |
| Open Source | Proprietary | Proprietary |
⚡ Context Window & Speed
Context Window (tokens)
3 Opus200K
OpenAI o1200K
| Metric | 3 Opus | OpenAI o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Output | 4,096 tok | ✓100,000 tok |
| Speed | 35 tok/s | ✓40 tok/s |
| Time to First Token | ✓1.2s | 5.0s |
| Languages | 50+ | 50+ |
📊 Benchmark Scores
Higher is better. Industry-standard AI evaluation benchmarks.
3 Opus
OpenAI o1
MMLU (Knowledge)
86.8|92.3
3 Opus
OpenAI o1
HumanEval (Coding)
84.9|92.4
3 Opus
OpenAI o1
MATH (Mathematics)
60.1|83.3
3 Opus
OpenAI o1
GPQA (Expert Q&A)
50.4|78.3
3 Opus
OpenAI o1
Chatbot Arena ELO
1248.0|1352.0
3 Opus
OpenAI o1
🔧 Capabilities
| Feature | 3 Opus | OpenAI o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Reasoning / Chain-of-Thought | ✕ | ✓ |
| Vision (Image Input) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio Input | ✕ | ✕ |
| Video Input | ✕ | ✕ |
| Image/Audio Output | ✕ | ✕ |
| Function Calling / Tools | ✓ | ✓ |
| JSON Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Real-time Web Access | ✕ | ✕ |
| Fine-tuning Support | ✕ | ✕ |
| Batch API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Streaming | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open Source | ✕ | ✕ |
ℹ️ Model Details
| Field | 3 Opus | OpenAI o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Knowledge Cutoff | 2023-08 | 2023-10 |
| Best For | complex analysisresearchlong context | reasoningmathsciencecomplex coding |
Quién debería comprar
Buy Anthropic Claude 3 Opus if…
The Anthropic Claude 3 Opus is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Buy OpenAI o1 if…
Buy the OpenAI o1 if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Community Vote
Who do you think wins this matchup?
Anthropic Claude 3 Opus vs OpenAI o1 — FAQ
Anthropic Claude 3 Opus vs OpenAI o1: which is better?
OpenAI o1 edges out the Anthropic Claude 3 Opus in the ai language models category, particularly in design, scoring 5.8/10 vs 4.4/10. If you want the better overall performer, OpenAI o1 is the clear pick.
Is Anthropic Claude 3 Opus better than OpenAI o1?
No, OpenAI o1 scores higher (9.3 vs 8.8).
Which is cheaper, Anthropic Claude 3 Opus or OpenAI o1?
Check the latest prices using the buy links above.
Who should buy the Anthropic Claude 3 Opus?
The Anthropic Claude 3 Opus is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Who should buy the OpenAI o1?
Buy the OpenAI o1 if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
