Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku vs OpenAI GPT-4o mini
AI Matrix
Powered by Claude AIAnthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku and OpenAI GPT-4o mini are closely matched ai language models devices with nearly identical overall scores (6.5 vs 6.3). The best choice depends on which specific features matter most to you.
Comparación de especificaciones
Anthropic Claude 3.5 HaikuOpenAI GPT-4o mini
Desglose de puntuación
Anthropic Claude 3.5 HaikuOpenAI GPT-4o mini
9.6
Cost Efficiency20% weight
9.9Empate
7.7
Benchmark (MMLU)30% weight
6.3Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku Ganador
3.9
Arena ELO20% weight
4.5OpenAI GPT-4o mini Ganador
1.9
Context Window10% weight
1.2Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku Ganador
5.7
Speed (tok/s)10% weight
7.1OpenAI GPT-4o mini Ganador
7.0
Coding (HumanEval)10% weight
6.8Empate
Scores are relative within the ai language modelscategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.
Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku
✓ Pros
- ●Strong performance score
- ●Superior battery life
✗ Cons
- ●Lower display score
OpenAI GPT-4o mini
✓ Pros
- ●Better display quality
- ●Better build and design
✗ Cons
- ●Shorter battery life
- ●Lower performance score
💰 Token Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Lower cost = better value. Free = open-source self-hosted.
| Metric | 3.5 Haiku | GPT-4o mini |
|---|---|---|
| Input (Prompt) | $0.80/1M | ✓$0.15/1M |
| Output (Completion) | $4.00/1M | ✓$0.60/1M |
| Open Source | Proprietary | Proprietary |
⚡ Context Window & Speed
Context Window (tokens)
3.5 Haiku200K
GPT-4o mini128K
| Metric | 3.5 Haiku | GPT-4o mini |
|---|---|---|
| Max Output | 8,192 tok | ✓16,384 tok |
| Speed | 180 tok/s | ✓220 tok/s |
| Time to First Token | 350ms | ✓280ms |
| Languages | 50+ | 50+ |
📊 Benchmark Scores
Higher is better. Industry-standard AI evaluation benchmarks.
3.5 Haiku
GPT-4o mini
MMLU (Knowledge)
87.1|82.0
3.5 Haiku
GPT-4o mini
HumanEval (Coding)
88.2|87.2
3.5 Haiku
GPT-4o mini
MATH (Mathematics)
69.2|70.2
3.5 Haiku
GPT-4o mini
GPQA (Expert Q&A)
41.6|40.2
3.5 Haiku
GPT-4o mini
Chatbot Arena ELO
1255.0|1272.0
3.5 Haiku
GPT-4o mini
🔧 Capabilities
| Feature | 3.5 Haiku | GPT-4o mini |
|---|---|---|
| Reasoning / Chain-of-Thought | ✕ | ✕ |
| Vision (Image Input) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio Input | ✕ | ✕ |
| Video Input | ✕ | ✕ |
| Image/Audio Output | ✕ | ✕ |
| Function Calling / Tools | ✓ | ✓ |
| JSON Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Real-time Web Access | ✕ | ✕ |
| Fine-tuning Support | ✕ | ✓ |
| Batch API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Streaming | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open Source | ✕ | ✕ |
ℹ️ Model Details
| Field | 3.5 Haiku | GPT-4o mini |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Knowledge Cutoff | 2024-07 | 2023-10 |
| Best For | fast taskshigh volumecost efficiencycoding | high volumecost efficiencysimple tasks |
Quién debería comprar
Buy Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku if…
The Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Buy OpenAI GPT-4o mini if…
The OpenAI GPT-4o mini is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Community Vote
Who do you think wins this matchup?
Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku vs OpenAI GPT-4o mini — FAQ
Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku vs OpenAI GPT-4o mini: which is better?
Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku and OpenAI GPT-4o mini are closely matched ai language models devices with nearly identical overall scores (6.5 vs 6.3). The best choice depends on which specific features matter most to you.
Is Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku better than OpenAI GPT-4o mini?
Both products score similarly — it depends on your priorities.
Which is cheaper, Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku or OpenAI GPT-4o mini?
Check the latest prices using the buy links above.
Who should buy the Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku?
The Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Who should buy the OpenAI GPT-4o mini?
The OpenAI GPT-4o mini is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
