Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku vs DeepSeek R1
AI Matrix
Powered by Claude AIDeepSeek R1 narrowly beats the Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku in the ai language models category, particularly in design, scoring 7.1/10 vs 6.5/10. If you want the better overall performer, DeepSeek R1 is the clear pick.
4 Reasons Why DeepSeek R1 Is Better
- 1.Better performance score: 8.8 vs 7.7
- 2.Higher camera score: 8.1 vs 7.0
- 3.Higher design rating: 7.7 vs 3.9
- 4.Higher overall score: 7.1/10 vs 6.5/10
Comparación de especificaciones
Anthropic Claude 3.5 HaikuDeepSeek R1
Desglose de puntuación
Anthropic Claude 3.5 HaikuDeepSeek R1
9.6
Cost Efficiency20% weight
9.7Empate
7.7
Benchmark (MMLU)30% weight
8.8DeepSeek R1 Ganador
3.9
Arena ELO20% weight
7.7DeepSeek R1 Ganador
1.9
Context Window10% weight
1.2Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku Ganador
5.7
Speed (tok/s)10% weight
0.2Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku Ganador
7.0
Coding (HumanEval)10% weight
8.1DeepSeek R1 Ganador
Scores are relative within the ai language modelscategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.
Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku
✓ Pros
- ●Better display quality
- ●Superior battery life
✗ Cons
- ●Lower camera score
- ●Lower performance score
DeepSeek R1
Ganador✓ Pros
- ●Strong performance score
- ●Higher camera score
- ●Better build and design
✗ Cons
- ●Shorter battery life
- ●Lower display score
💰 Token Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Lower cost = better value. Free = open-source self-hosted.
| Metric | 3.5 Haiku | DeepSeek R1 |
|---|---|---|
| Input (Prompt) | $0.80/1M | ✓$0.55/1M |
| Output (Completion) | $4.00/1M | ✓$2.19/1M |
| Open Source | Proprietary | ✓ Free |
⚡ Context Window & Speed
Context Window (tokens)
3.5 Haiku200K
DeepSeek R1128K
| Metric | 3.5 Haiku | DeepSeek R1 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Output | 8,192 tok | ✓32,768 tok |
| Speed | ✓180 tok/s | 25 tok/s |
| Time to First Token | ✓350ms | 3.0s |
| Languages | ✓50+ | 20+ |
📊 Benchmark Scores
Higher is better. Industry-standard AI evaluation benchmarks.
3.5 Haiku
DeepSeek R1
MMLU (Knowledge)
87.1|90.8
3.5 Haiku
DeepSeek R1
HumanEval (Coding)
88.2|92.6
3.5 Haiku
DeepSeek R1
MATH (Mathematics)
69.2|97.3
3.5 Haiku
DeepSeek R1
GPQA (Expert Q&A)
41.6|71.5
3.5 Haiku
DeepSeek R1
Chatbot Arena ELO
1255.0|1358.0
3.5 Haiku
DeepSeek R1
🔧 Capabilities
| Feature | 3.5 Haiku | DeepSeek R1 |
|---|---|---|
| Reasoning / Chain-of-Thought | ✕ | ✓ |
| Vision (Image Input) | ✓ | ✕ |
| Audio Input | ✕ | ✕ |
| Video Input | ✕ | ✕ |
| Image/Audio Output | ✕ | ✕ |
| Function Calling / Tools | ✓ | ✕ |
| JSON Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Real-time Web Access | ✕ | ✕ |
| Fine-tuning Support | ✕ | ✓ |
| Batch API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Streaming | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open Source | ✕ | ✓ |
ℹ️ Model Details
| Field | 3.5 Haiku | DeepSeek R1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | DeepSeek |
| Parameters | — | 671B (37B active) |
| Knowledge Cutoff | 2024-07 | 2024-07 |
| License | Commercial | MIT |
| Best For | fast taskshigh volumecost efficiencycoding | reasoningmathscienceopen sourcecost efficiency |
Quién debería comprar
Buy Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku if…
The Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Buy DeepSeek R1 if…
Buy the DeepSeek R1 if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku vs DeepSeek R1 — FAQ
Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku vs DeepSeek R1: which is better?
DeepSeek R1 narrowly beats the Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku in the ai language models category, particularly in design, scoring 7.1/10 vs 6.5/10. If you want the better overall performer, DeepSeek R1 is the clear pick.
Is Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku better than DeepSeek R1?
No, DeepSeek R1 scores higher (9.2 vs 8.4).
Which is cheaper, Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku or DeepSeek R1?
Check the latest prices using the buy links above.
Who should buy the Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku?
The Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Who should buy the DeepSeek R1?
Buy the DeepSeek R1 if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
