Looking for an honest Apple AirPods Pro 2 (USB-C) vs Beats by Dr. Dre Fit Pro True - Stone comparison in 2026? We scored both earbuds on the same six-dimension framework — performance, battery, display, camera, design and value — using identical methodology, so the numbers below are directly comparable. In our overall scoring the Beats by Dr. Dre Fit Pro True - Stone comes out ahead 34/100 to 60/100 — a 26-point gap. The widest gap is in design and build, where the Beats by Dr. Dre Fit Pro True - Stone pulls noticeably ahead. On price the Beats by Dr. Dre Fit Pro True - Stone undercuts the Apple AirPods Pro 2 (USB-C) by 283% ($65 vs $249), which materially changes the value calculus for budget-conscious buyers.
Prices may vary · We may earn a commission on purchases. Learn more
Beats by Dr. Dre Fit Pro True - Stone clearly outperforms the Apple AirPods Pro 2 (USB-C) in the earbuds category, especially in value ($65 vs $249), scoring 60 vs 34. If you want the better overall earbuds, Beats by Dr. Dre Fit Pro True - Stone is the recommended choice.
Picking Beats by Dr. Dre Fit Pro True - Stone over Apple AirPods Pro 2 (USB-C) means trading these off.
Nada significativo — las especificaciones son prácticamente iguales
Apple
$249
Scores are relative within the earbudscategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
| Spec | Apple AirPods Pro 2 (USB-C) | Beats by Dr. Dre Fit Pro True - StoneW |
|---|---|---|
| Type | — | In-ear (TWS) |
| Driver Type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 9mm |
| Frequency Response | — | 20 Hz - 20,000 Hz |
| ANC | true | Active Noise Cancelling |
| Transparency Mode | — | Yes |
| Spatial Audio | — | Yes (with dynamic head tracking) |
| EQ App | — | Beats app |
| Touch Controls | — | Yes |
| Voice Assistant | — | Siri |
| Battery Life | 6hrs | 6hrs |
| Case Battery | 30hrs✓ | 24hrs |
| Wireless Charging | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| Codecs | — | SBC, AAC |
| Multipoint | — | Yes (2 devices) |
| Water Resistance | — | IPX4 |
| Fit | — | In-ear |
| Weight | — | 5g |
| Colors | — | Stone Purple, Black |
| Price | 249$ | 65$✓ |
Buy Apple AirPods Pro 2 (USB-C) if…
The Apple AirPods Pro 2 (USB-C) is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Buy Beats by Dr. Dre Fit Pro True - Stone if…
Buy the Beats by Dr. Dre Fit Pro True - Stone if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Beats by Dr. Dre Fit Pro True - Stone clearly outperforms the Apple AirPods Pro 2 (USB-C) in the earbuds category, especially in value ($65 vs $249), scoring 60 vs 34. If you want the better overall earbuds, Beats by Dr. Dre Fit Pro True - Stone is the recommended choice.
No, Beats by Dr. Dre Fit Pro True - Stone scores higher (60 vs 91).
Beats by Dr. Dre Fit Pro True - Stone is cheaper at $65 vs $249 for the Apple AirPods Pro 2 (USB-C).
The Apple AirPods Pro 2 (USB-C) is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Buy the Beats by Dr. Dre Fit Pro True - Stone if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Both offer 6 hours of battery life.
Reviewed by VersusMatrix Editorial Team
Last updated: May 30, 2026
Methodology: AI-powered analysis of technical specifications from manufacturer data. Scores are calculated by comparing products across multiple dimensions and normalized relative to the full category database. Our editorial process is independent and not influenced by affiliate partnerships.