Looking for an honest Meta Llama 3.1 405B vs Meta Llama 4 Maverick comparison in 2026? We scored both ai language models on the same six-dimension framework — performance, battery, display, camera, design and value — using identical methodology, so the numbers below are directly comparable. In our overall scoring the Meta Llama 4 Maverick comes out ahead 62/100 to 79/100 — a 17-point gap. The widest gap is in battery life, where the Meta Llama 4 Maverick pulls noticeably ahead.
Prices may vary · We may earn a commission on purchases. Learn more
Meta Llama 4 Maverick clearly outperforms the Meta Llama 3.1 405B in the ai language models category, especially in battery life, scoring 79 vs 62. If you want the better overall ai language models, Meta Llama 4 Maverick is the recommended choice.
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
Lower cost = better value. Free = open-source self-hosted.
| Metric | 3.1 405B | 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| Input (Prompt) | Free/1M | Free/1M |
| Output (Completion) | Free/1M | Free/1M |
| Open Source | ✓ Free | ✓ Free |
Context Window (tokens)
| Metric | 3.1 405B | 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| Max Output | 4,096 tok | ✓16,384 tok |
| Speed | 30 tok/s | ✓80 tok/s |
| Time to First Token | 1.5s | ✓800ms |
| Languages | 8+ | ✓12+ |
Higher is better. Industry-standard AI evaluation benchmarks.
3.1 405B
4 Maverick
3.1 405B
4 Maverick
3.1 405B
4 Maverick
3.1 405B
4 Maverick
3.1 405B
4 Maverick
| Feature | 3.1 405B | 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| Reasoning / Chain-of-Thought | ✕ | ✕ |
| Vision (Image Input) | ✕ | ✓ |
| Audio Input | ✕ | ✕ |
| Video Input | ✕ | ✕ |
| Image/Audio Output | ✕ | ✕ |
| Function Calling / Tools | ✓ | ✓ |
| JSON Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Real-time Web Access | ✕ | ✕ |
| Fine-tuning Support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Batch API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Streaming | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open Source | ✓ | ✓ |
| Field | 3.1 405B | 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Meta |
| Parameters | 405B | 400B (17B active) |
| Knowledge Cutoff | 2023-12 | 2025-03 |
| License | Llama 3.1 Community | Llama 4 Community |
| Best For | open sourceself hostingfine tuningenterprise privacy | open sourcemultimodalcodinggeneral |
Buy Meta Llama 3.1 405B if…
The Meta Llama 3.1 405B is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Buy Meta Llama 4 Maverick if…
Buy the Meta Llama 4 Maverick if you want the best overall value in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Meta Llama 4 Maverick clearly outperforms the Meta Llama 3.1 405B in the ai language models category, especially in battery life, scoring 79 vs 62. If you want the better overall ai language models, Meta Llama 4 Maverick is the recommended choice.
No, Meta Llama 4 Maverick scores higher (75 vs 75).
Check the latest prices using the buy links above.
The Meta Llama 3.1 405B is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Buy the Meta Llama 4 Maverick if you want the best overall value in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Reviewed by VersusMatrix Editorial Team
Last updated: April 25, 2026
Methodology: AI-powered analysis of technical specifications from manufacturer data. Scores are calculated by comparing products across multiple dimensions and normalized relative to the full category database. Our editorial process is independent and not influenced by affiliate partnerships.
Scores are relative within the ai language modelscategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.