Kingston KC3000 vs Samsung MZ-ALQ5120 M.2 NVMe SSD
Prices may vary · We may earn a commission on purchases. Learn more
AI Matrix
Powered by Claude AIKingston KC3000 edges out the Samsung MZ-ALQ5120 M.2 NVMe SSD in the ssd storage category, especially in performance, scoring 47 vs 33. If you want the better overall ssd storage, Kingston KC3000 is the recommended choice.
5 Reasons Why Kingston KC3000 Is Better
- 1.Faster read speed: 7,000MB/s vs 3,400MB/s
- 2.Faster write speed: 5,000MB/s vs 2,300MB/s
- 3.Higher endurance: 1200 TBW vs 300 TBW
- 4.Better performance score: 49 vs 23
- 5.Better display rating: 41 vs 18
Worauf verzichtest du?
Picking Kingston KC3000 over Samsung MZ-ALQ5120 M.2 NVMe SSD means trading these off.
Du verzichtest auf
- −$194 cheaper ($54.99 vs $249)
You gain
Specs are roughly matched — winner decided on overall scoring, not a specific spec advantage.
Spezifikationsvergleich
Kingston KC3000Samsung MZ-ALQ5120 M.2 NVMe SSD
Punktaufteilung
Kingston KC3000Samsung MZ-ALQ5120 M.2 NVMe SSD
73
Price20% weight
98Samsung MZ-ALQ5120 M.2 NVMe SSD Gewinner
49
Read Speed30% weight
23Kingston KC3000 Gewinner
41
Write Speed20% weight
18Kingston KC3000 Gewinner
35
Capacity15% weight
12Kingston KC3000 Gewinner
31
Endurance15% weight
6Kingston KC3000 Gewinner
Scores are relative within the ssd storagecategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.
Kingston KC3000
Gewinner✓ Pros
- ●Higher performance score
- ●Better display score
- ●Better battery score
✗ Cons
- ●Higher price: $249 vs $54.99
- ●Higher price relative to value
Samsung MZ-ALQ5120 M.2 NVMe SSD
✓ Pros
- ●Lower price: $54.99 vs $249
- ●Better value for money
✗ Cons
- ●Weaker battery score
- ●Lower display score
- ●Lower performance score
Spezifikationsvergleich
| Spec | Kingston KC3000W | Samsung MZ-ALQ5120 M.2 NVMe SSD |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 249$ | 54.99$✓ |
| Storage | — | 512GB |
| Weight | — | 10g |
| Dimensions | — | 80 x 22 x 2.38 mm |
Wer sollte kaufen
Buy Kingston KC3000 if…
Buy the Kingston KC3000 if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Buy Samsung MZ-ALQ5120 M.2 NVMe SSD if…
Choose the Samsung MZ-ALQ5120 M.2 NVMe SSD if budget is your top priority — it offers competitive specs at a lower price point.
Kingston KC3000 vs Samsung MZ-ALQ5120 M.2 NVMe SSD — FAQ
Kingston KC3000 vs Samsung MZ-ALQ5120 M.2 NVMe SSD: which is better?
Kingston KC3000 edges out the Samsung MZ-ALQ5120 M.2 NVMe SSD in the ssd storage category, especially in performance, scoring 47 vs 33. If you want the better overall ssd storage, Kingston KC3000 is the recommended choice.
Is Kingston KC3000 better than Samsung MZ-ALQ5120 M.2 NVMe SSD?
Yes, Kingston KC3000 scores higher overall (51 vs 28).
Which is cheaper, Kingston KC3000 or Samsung MZ-ALQ5120 M.2 NVMe SSD?
Samsung MZ-ALQ5120 M.2 NVMe SSD is cheaper at $54.99 vs $249 for the Kingston KC3000.
Who should buy the Kingston KC3000?
Buy the Kingston KC3000 if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Who should buy the Samsung MZ-ALQ5120 M.2 NVMe SSD?
Choose the Samsung MZ-ALQ5120 M.2 NVMe SSD if budget is your top priority — it offers competitive specs at a lower price point.
Full Kingston KC3000 review →Full Samsung MZ-ALQ5120 M.2 NVMe SSD review →All Kingston SSD Storage →All Samsung SSD Storage →
Reviewed by VersusMatrix Editorial Team
Last updated: April 28, 2026
Methodology: AI-powered analysis of technical specifications from manufacturer data. Scores are calculated by comparing products across multiple dimensions and normalized relative to the full category database. Our editorial process is independent and not influenced by affiliate partnerships.