OpenAI GPT-4o vs Meta Llama 3.1 405B
AI Matrix
Powered by Claude AIOpenAI GPT-4o narrowly beats the Meta Llama 3.1 405B in the ai language models category, particularly in display, scoring 6.7/10 vs 6.2/10. If you want the better overall performer, OpenAI GPT-4o is the clear pick.
3 Reasons Why OpenAI GPT-4o Is Better
- 1.Better display rating: 3.6 vs 0.4
- 2.Higher design rating: 6.1 vs 4.4
- 3.Higher overall score: 6.7/10 vs 6.2/10
Spezifikationsvergleich
OpenAI GPT-4oMeta Llama 3.1 405B
Bewertungsaufschlüsselung
OpenAI GPT-4oMeta Llama 3.1 405B
8.8
Cost Efficiency20% weight
10.0Meta Llama 3.1 405B Gewinner
8.2
Benchmark (MMLU)30% weight
8.2Unentschieden
6.1
Arena ELO20% weight
4.4OpenAI GPT-4o Gewinner
1.2
Context Window10% weight
1.2Unentschieden
3.6
Speed (tok/s)10% weight
0.4OpenAI GPT-4o Gewinner
7.6
Coding (HumanEval)10% weight
7.3Unentschieden
Scores are relative within the ai language modelscategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.
OpenAI GPT-4o
Gewinner✓ Pros
- ●Better display quality
- ●Better build and design
✗ Cons
- ●Higher price tag
Meta Llama 3.1 405B
✓ Pros
- ●Better value for money
✗ Cons
- ●Lower display score
💰 Token Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Lower cost = better value. Free = open-source self-hosted.
| Metric | OpenAI GPT-4o | 3.1 405B |
|---|---|---|
| Input (Prompt) | $2.50/1M | ✓Free/1M |
| Output (Completion) | $10.00/1M | ✓Free/1M |
| Open Source | Proprietary | ✓ Free |
⚡ Context Window & Speed
Context Window (tokens)
OpenAI GPT-4o128K
3.1 405B128K
| Metric | OpenAI GPT-4o | 3.1 405B |
|---|---|---|
| Max Output | ✓16,384 tok | 4,096 tok |
| Speed | ✓120 tok/s | 30 tok/s |
| Time to First Token | ✓500ms | 1.5s |
| Languages | ✓50+ | 8+ |
📊 Benchmark Scores
Higher is better. Industry-standard AI evaluation benchmarks.
OpenAI GPT-4o
3.1 405B
MMLU (Knowledge)
88.7|88.6
OpenAI GPT-4o
3.1 405B
HumanEval (Coding)
90.2|89.0
OpenAI GPT-4o
3.1 405B
MATH (Mathematics)
76.6|73.8
OpenAI GPT-4o
3.1 405B
GPQA (Expert Q&A)
53.6|51.1
OpenAI GPT-4o
3.1 405B
Chatbot Arena ELO
1314.0|1270.0
OpenAI GPT-4o
3.1 405B
🔧 Capabilities
| Feature | OpenAI GPT-4o | 3.1 405B |
|---|---|---|
| Reasoning / Chain-of-Thought | ✕ | ✕ |
| Vision (Image Input) | ✓ | ✕ |
| Audio Input | ✓ | ✕ |
| Video Input | ✕ | ✕ |
| Image/Audio Output | ✓ | ✕ |
| Function Calling / Tools | ✓ | ✓ |
| JSON Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Real-time Web Access | ✕ | ✕ |
| Fine-tuning Support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Batch API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Streaming | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open Source | ✕ | ✓ |
ℹ️ Model Details
| Field | OpenAI GPT-4o | 3.1 405B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Meta |
| Parameters | — | 405B |
| Knowledge Cutoff | 2024-04 | 2023-12 |
| License | Commercial | Llama 3.1 Community |
| Best For | generalcodingvisionmultimodal | open sourceself hostingfine tuningenterprise privacy |
Wer sollte kaufen
Buy OpenAI GPT-4o if…
Buy the OpenAI GPT-4o if you want the best overall value in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Buy Meta Llama 3.1 405B if…
Choose the Meta Llama 3.1 405B if budget is your top priority — it offers competitive specs at a lower price point.
OpenAI GPT-4o vs Meta Llama 3.1 405B — FAQ
OpenAI GPT-4o vs Meta Llama 3.1 405B: which is better?
OpenAI GPT-4o narrowly beats the Meta Llama 3.1 405B in the ai language models category, particularly in display, scoring 6.7/10 vs 6.2/10. If you want the better overall performer, OpenAI GPT-4o is the clear pick.
Is OpenAI GPT-4o better than Meta Llama 3.1 405B?
Yes, OpenAI GPT-4o scores higher overall (9.2 vs 8.7).
Which is cheaper, OpenAI GPT-4o or Meta Llama 3.1 405B?
Check the latest prices using the buy links above.
Who should buy the OpenAI GPT-4o?
Buy the OpenAI GPT-4o if you want the best overall value in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Who should buy the Meta Llama 3.1 405B?
Choose the Meta Llama 3.1 405B if budget is your top priority — it offers competitive specs at a lower price point.
