OpenAI GPT-4o mini vs Meta Llama 3.1 405B
AI Matrix
Powered by Claude AIOpenAI GPT-4o mini and Meta Llama 3.1 405B are closely matched ai language models devices with nearly identical overall scores (6.3 vs 6.2). The best choice depends on which specific features matter most to you.
Spezifikationsvergleich
OpenAI GPT-4o miniMeta Llama 3.1 405B
Bewertungsaufschlüsselung
OpenAI GPT-4o miniMeta Llama 3.1 405B
9.9
Cost Efficiency20% weight
10.0Unentschieden
6.3
Benchmark (MMLU)30% weight
8.2Meta Llama 3.1 405B Gewinner
4.5
Arena ELO20% weight
4.4Unentschieden
1.2
Context Window10% weight
1.2Unentschieden
7.1
Speed (tok/s)10% weight
0.4OpenAI GPT-4o mini Gewinner
6.8
Coding (HumanEval)10% weight
7.3Unentschieden
Scores are relative within the ai language modelscategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.
OpenAI GPT-4o mini
✓ Pros
- ●Better display quality
✗ Cons
- ●Lower camera score
- ●Lower performance score
Meta Llama 3.1 405B
✓ Pros
- ●Strong performance score
- ●Higher camera score
✗ Cons
- ●Lower display score
💰 Token Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Lower cost = better value. Free = open-source self-hosted.
| Metric | GPT-4o mini | 3.1 405B |
|---|---|---|
| Input (Prompt) | $0.15/1M | ✓Free/1M |
| Output (Completion) | $0.60/1M | ✓Free/1M |
| Open Source | Proprietary | ✓ Free |
⚡ Context Window & Speed
Context Window (tokens)
GPT-4o mini128K
3.1 405B128K
| Metric | GPT-4o mini | 3.1 405B |
|---|---|---|
| Max Output | ✓16,384 tok | 4,096 tok |
| Speed | ✓220 tok/s | 30 tok/s |
| Time to First Token | ✓280ms | 1.5s |
| Languages | ✓50+ | 8+ |
📊 Benchmark Scores
Higher is better. Industry-standard AI evaluation benchmarks.
GPT-4o mini
3.1 405B
MMLU (Knowledge)
82.0|88.6
GPT-4o mini
3.1 405B
HumanEval (Coding)
87.2|89.0
GPT-4o mini
3.1 405B
MATH (Mathematics)
70.2|73.8
GPT-4o mini
3.1 405B
GPQA (Expert Q&A)
40.2|51.1
GPT-4o mini
3.1 405B
Chatbot Arena ELO
1272.0|1270.0
GPT-4o mini
3.1 405B
🔧 Capabilities
| Feature | GPT-4o mini | 3.1 405B |
|---|---|---|
| Reasoning / Chain-of-Thought | ✕ | ✕ |
| Vision (Image Input) | ✓ | ✕ |
| Audio Input | ✕ | ✕ |
| Video Input | ✕ | ✕ |
| Image/Audio Output | ✕ | ✕ |
| Function Calling / Tools | ✓ | ✓ |
| JSON Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Real-time Web Access | ✕ | ✕ |
| Fine-tuning Support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Batch API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Streaming | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open Source | ✕ | ✓ |
ℹ️ Model Details
| Field | GPT-4o mini | 3.1 405B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Meta |
| Parameters | — | 405B |
| Knowledge Cutoff | 2023-10 | 2023-12 |
| License | Commercial | Llama 3.1 Community |
| Best For | high volumecost efficiencysimple tasks | open sourceself hostingfine tuningenterprise privacy |
Wer sollte kaufen
Buy OpenAI GPT-4o mini if…
The OpenAI GPT-4o mini is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Buy Meta Llama 3.1 405B if…
The Meta Llama 3.1 405B is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
OpenAI GPT-4o mini vs Meta Llama 3.1 405B — FAQ
OpenAI GPT-4o mini vs Meta Llama 3.1 405B: which is better?
OpenAI GPT-4o mini and Meta Llama 3.1 405B are closely matched ai language models devices with nearly identical overall scores (6.3 vs 6.2). The best choice depends on which specific features matter most to you.
Is OpenAI GPT-4o mini better than Meta Llama 3.1 405B?
Both products score similarly — it depends on your priorities.
Which is cheaper, OpenAI GPT-4o mini or Meta Llama 3.1 405B?
Check the latest prices using the buy links above.
Who should buy the OpenAI GPT-4o mini?
The OpenAI GPT-4o mini is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Who should buy the Meta Llama 3.1 405B?
The Meta Llama 3.1 405B is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
